Cyprus-Forum.com

[Paphitis]

calling people in pakistan pakis is like calling blcak people nigers. i suppose being in ausi land it is expected that you should be worried.

back to the attack on the mosque. the people attacking shi-ites are sunis who have been supported to the hilt by the americans since the 50s. after all the shi-ites have always been pro-iran. the american interference in these parts of the world or that last 40 years has been a disaster which muslims of all persuasion have been paying for. if indeed god does exist and balances things in the long run, not even your god will be able to help you.

What a load of crap.

Most Pakis are very moderate people and support the young democracy that is developing in the country and the attempts of modernization.

They are an ally of the US because they view the US as a kind of insurance policy against the radicalized elements that exist in Pakistan, such as the Taliban.

The military is armed by the US to maintain control of the country and it is an important institution for them.

Pakistan has one of the most remarkable politicians in the world in Imran Khan. I believe he is the future President in waiting, a statesman and an extremely humble, generous and beautiful man. He will be greater than Gandhi!

the real question is very simple. is america helping in this part of the world or hindering. history will judge america more harshly then in vietnam. i suppose assholes will still claim that america was right to interfere in vietnam or cambodia too and i suppose the greek pigs will fly.

hereis the meaning of paki you ignorant wombat.

Paki acquired offensive connotations in the 1960s when used by British tabloids to refer to subjects of former colony states in a derogatory and racist manner. In modern British usage "Paki" is typically a derogatory label used for all South Asians, including Indians, Afghans and Bangladeshis.

Well the fact remains, that if it was not for the Americans, the Pakistani Military would not be as strong and may not be able to keep the Taliban at bay.

So what do you prefer? A democratic moderate Pakistan, or a medieval Pakistan controlled by the Taliban?

And Pakis is still used in Australia and it has no negative connotations at all. It is even used by Australia's biggest cricket journalists and commentators who are telecast to Pakistan and India itself, before an audience of a billion people, and the same commentators (being former Aussie cricketers) are actually good mates with the Paki Cricketers and Imran Khan himself who is one of the greats and a legend and will be Pakistan's future president, and who regularly visits Australia each year.

[Lordo]

america is capable of stopping pakistan turning to fanatic muslim state as much as they were able to stop south vietnam being taken over by the communists. in the end they will fail and those who come to power will be far more extreme because of the american interference. but you are too dumb to see the damage america is doing round the world.

[Paphitis]

america is capable of stopping pakistan turning to fanatic muslim state as much as they were able to stop south vietnam being taken over by the communists. in the end they will fail and those who come to power will be far more extreme because of the american interference. but you are too dumb to see the damage america is doing round the world.

They are doing a good job so far.

But don't give America all the credit. They are merely just giving a small helping hand.

It's the moderate Pakistani voices, the elites, establishment, intelligentsia and the Pakistani Military who are maintaining control of the situation and that is the way the vast majority want it.

[Lordo]

if this is great job i dread to see their worst. they have been in afghanistan for over 10 years and what exactly have they resolved other than flattening the country and its economy. and how exactly does that help peace other then generate suicide bombers to attack the western interests.

[miltiades]

if this is great job i dread to see their worst. they have been in afghanistan for over 10 years and what exactly have they resolved other than flattening the country and its economy. and how exactly does that help peace other then generate suicide bombers to attack the western interests.

Stupid, these people deserve the most ruthless dictator, they will NEVER have peace for as long as theyt have a distorted religious ideology as their guiding light

[Lordo]

calling people in pakistan pakis is like calling blcak people nigers. i suppose being in ausi land it is expected that you should be worried.

back to the attack on the mosque. the people attacking shi-ites are sunis who have been supported to the hilt by the americans since the 50s. after all the shi-ites have always been pro-iran. the american interference in these parts of the world or that last 40 years has been a disaster which muslims of all persuasion have been paying for. if indeed god does exist and balances things in the long run, not even your god will be able to help you.

What a load of crap.

Most Pakis are very moderate people and support the young democracy that is developing in the country and the attempts of modernization.

They are an ally of the US because they view the US as a kind of insurance policy against the radicalized elements that exist in Pakistan, such as the Taliban.

The military is armed by the US to maintain control of the country and it is an important institution for them.

Pakistan has one of the most remarkable politicians in the world in Imran Khan. I believe he is the future President in waiting, a statesman and an extremely humble, generous and beautiful man. He will be greater than Gandhi!

the real question is very simple. is america helping in this part of the world or hindering. history will judge america more harshly then in vietnam. i suppose assholes will still claim that america was right to interfere in vietnam or cambodia too and i suppose the greek pigs will fly.

hereis the meaning of paki you ignorant wombat.

Paki acquired offensive connotations in the 1960s when used by British tabloids to refer to subjects of former colony states in a derogatory and racist manner. In modern British usage "Paki" is typically a derogatory label used for all South Asians, including Indians, Afghans and Bangladeshis.

Well the fact remains, that if it was not for the Americans, the Pakistani Military would not be as strong and may not be able to keep the Taliban at bay.

So what do you prefer? A democratic moderate Pakistan, or a medieval Pakistan controlled by the Taliban?

And Pakis is still used in Australia and it has no negative connotations at all. It is even used by Australia's biggest cricket journalists and commentators who are telecast to Pakistan and India itself, before an audience of a billion people, and the same commentators (being former Aussie cricketers) are actually good mates with the Paki Cricketers and Imran Khan himself who is one of the greats and a legend and will be Pakistan's future president, and who regularly visits Australia each year.

do you mean a bit like democratically elected hamas in gaza and muslim brotherhood in egypt. is that the kind of democracy you and the stupid yankees prefer.

[Maximus]

No Bordo, its the kind of 'democracy' you and Turkey prefers.

[Lordo]

you mean like the election practices in groc, where you give no time to the opposition and attack their cars when they have a meeting.

what about the democratic election in egypt and gaza were they allowed to run their country. who exactly is blocking them.

[Paphitis]

if this is great job i dread to see their worst. they have been in afghanistan for over 10 years and what exactly have they resolved other than flattening the country and its economy. and how exactly does that help peace other then generate suicide bombers to attack the western interests.

The Taliban have always tried to take over Pakistan without success.

We will never allow the Taliban into power in Pakistan. If it happens, then it is possible that Pakistan will be destroyed with Nuclear Strikes! There is no way we will allow Pakistan's nuclear arsenal into Taliban hands.

Then you will be able to truthfully accuse the U.S. of killing millions of civilians.

Is that what you want?

But don't worry because the last thing the US wants is to do is such a grizzly act which is only the most last resort. For now, we just support the Pakis and keep things well under control so that they don't start a war with India and to keep the cutthroats at bay which is why the Pakistanis have a very modern military force.

Maybe you should be thanking the USA because I guarantee you, because you live in London.

So say thank you USA!

[Lordo]

if this is great job i dread to see their worst. they have been in afghanistan for over 10 years and what exactly have they resolved other than flattening the country and its economy. and how exactly does that help peace other then generate suicide bombers to attack the western interests.

Stupid, these people deserve the most ruthless dictator, they will NEVER have peace for as long as theyt have a distorted religious ideology as their guiding light

you are more ignorant them them. what ever they do, they do not have such stupid ideas like you have.