Cyprus-Forum.com

[miltiades]

What an ultra ....religious Psychopath. Mate, if anyone considered becoming religious should take a look at your comments.
"skeleton of a whore you call a mother "

How religious, god fearing, statement the above is.
At least I have never and would never insult anyones mother dead or alive, thats because Im not ...religious, but a realist, one who knows not to insult any members of a family, I insult you of course by stating the truth that you are a fucking piece of shit of a psycho

I’m sure you LOVE it when I call your mom a whore and I’ll bet you even masturbate to it because let’s face it… only a total pushto-pezevenkis would keep provoking me with it and peddling his mother around just to hear more!

I’ve always known that you’re a kopritis…

I know from a very reliable source that psychopaths are easily provoked, such as you with your disgusting outbursts. Lets face it, you are sick and need serious help. I will pay for your one way ticket to Syria so that you can blow your self up, you disgusting little shit

Etsi din vriskis mana mou esi… areski sou na akouis gia din mana sou sinehia!

Kouloumbaras, bisogoundis, taxitzis… eshis ta oulla ta brosonda!

Egio eshi hronia bou se katalava… isoun to boutanoui tis Bafou!

I shouldnt really tease a psycho, it only exacerbates his mental condition.
Do you want that ticket, YES or NO

[Get Real!]

Stephen Hawking, science fiction writer

“And so Hawking now claims that the universe simply popped into existence from nothing whatsoever, resting his claim purely upon mathematical constructs that are no less fictional than seventh-grade quadratic equations.”

http://senseofevents.blogspot.com/2010/ ... riter.html

[miltiades]

Stephen Hawking, science fiction writer

“And so Hawking now claims that the universe simply popped into existence from nothing whatsoever, resting his claim purely upon mathematical constructs that are no less fictional than seventh-grade quadratic equations.”

http://senseofevents.blogspot.com/2010/ ... riter.html

Well he is ...wrong isn't he. A bearded being created by prehistoric beings who called HIM Allah created the universe
And idiots more than 2000 years later still believe in these utter rubbish !!!

[GreekIslandGirl]

Because if a group of people is shown to be tiny (0.15% as the fake results show the number of the "Atheists/No-religion" group) then these people can be ignored much easier. Example: Mandatory religion courses in schools, which I believe should be optional, but it is much harder to make that argument if fake census data shows that practically everybody who attends our public schools is Orthodox.

But the fact you as an "atheist" were classified as religious or not has nothing to do with how many proffered an actual choice.

You are bothering over a big fat nothing. Like your belief.

As an "atheist" you are a fake.

And what a "fake atheist" is supposed to be?

You have replaced one faith with another. Furthermore, your gripe is based on an expectation that your "atheism" belief be classifiable under "religion". Ergo, you are a fake.

[Atheist]

Because if a group of people is shown to be tiny (0.15% as the fake results show the number of the "Atheists/No-religion" group) then these people can be ignored much easier. Example: Mandatory religion courses in schools, which I believe should be optional, but it is much harder to make that argument if fake census data shows that practically everybody who attends our public schools is Orthodox.

But the fact you as an "atheist" were classified as religious or not has nothing to do with how many proffered an actual choice.

You are bothering over a big fat nothing. Like your belief.

As an "atheist" you are a fake.

And what a "fake atheist" is supposed to be?

You have replaced one faith with another. Furthermore, your gripe is based on an expectation that your "atheism" belief be classifiable under "religion". Ergo, you are a fake.

Atheism was classified under "religion" by the statistical service and my "gripe" is exactly that Atheism is not an "Other" religion, but the absence of religion and therefore the correct option would be "none". They didn't provide a correct way for the atheist/ no-religion option to be recorded but they made up a fake number to include in their census results.

[GreekIslandGirl]

Because if a group of people is shown to be tiny (0.15% as the fake results show the number of the "Atheists/No-religion" group) then these people can be ignored much easier. Example: Mandatory religion courses in schools, which I believe should be optional, but it is much harder to make that argument if fake census data shows that practically everybody who attends our public schools is Orthodox.

But the fact you as an "atheist" were classified as religious or not has nothing to do with how many proffered an actual choice.

You are bothering over a big fat nothing. Like your belief.

As an "atheist" you are a fake.

And what a "fake atheist" is supposed to be?

You have replaced one faith with another. Furthermore, your gripe is based on an expectation that your "atheism" belief be classifiable under "religion". Ergo, you are a fake.

Atheism was classified under "religion" by the statistical service and my "gripe" is exactly that Atheism is not an "Other" religion, but the absence of religion and therefore the correct option would be "none". They didn't provide a correct way for the atheist/ no-religion option to be recorded but they made up a fake number to include in their census results.

At the very least, you are confused. This is what you said in your opening post:

....while asking "Orthodox Christian, right?" to which I answered that I was atheist.

You didn't answer "none", as you now say. You answered for your religion as being "atheist". So the census chap must have written that down and out it came in the statistics.

[Atheist]

"GreekIslandGirl" do you speak Greek? Do you know what the Greek word "atheist" with "στερητικό Α" mean?

The census chap said that there was no place in the form for "Atheist" or "No religion" or "none". Maybe a few census chaps did that, but most didn't even ask the question and filled the form themselves, and most of those who did ask didn't know of any way to record "no religion/Atheism" responses.

[Get Real!]

The census chap said that there was no place in the form for "Atheist" or "No religion" or "none". Maybe a few census chaps did that, but most didn't even ask the question and filled the form themselves, and most of those who did ask didn't know of any way to record "no religion/Atheism" responses.

Why didn't you just tell him that you believe in the gay God Aziz...

http://www.namespedia.com/image/Asiz_4.jpg

[Lordo]

Stephen Hawking, science fiction writer

“And so Hawking now claims that the universe simply popped into existence from nothing whatsoever, resting his claim purely upon mathematical constructs that are no less fictional than seventh-grade quadratic equations.”

http://senseofevents.blogspot.com/2010/ ... riter.html

thats not what hawking said you stupid fool, sensing claimed hawking said that. if only his god gave him some sense. you cannot produce something from nothing, that goes against all scientific laws. explosion of creation came from very dense material. almost as dense as your brain. but slightly less dense. does that help?

how the hell did god created the universe. and even if it is true who created god you stupid boy.

and another thing if you look at the drawings of adam and eve, how come they both have navels. where were they incubated in a test tube.


you stupid boy.

[Get Real!]

...who created god you stupid boy.

You're as daft as that gay Atheist... if an entity is everlasting how can it need creation?