Garavnoss wrote:There are two opposing views on the Holocaust, those that accept that it took place and those who insist it did not.
As much as the YES camp show evidence to prove their case, the No camp show evidence to prove theirs, the end result is moot.
The route to a resolution of the problem is quite easy providing certain guidelines are set.
If it DID take place, I am sure that nobody would disagree that it was an awful episode in human history.
If it did NOT, I am sure that nobody would disagree that it was the greatest lie ever foisted upon human history.
If it DID take place, the Jews deserve much sympathy but great praise for their endurance in the aftermath.
If it did NOT, the Jews deserve much sympathy but great praise for the manner in which they insist it did.
Hardly a day has gone by in the past half century without there being some reference to the Holocaust, whether it be in Films, on our Televisions, in Newspapers/Magazines, Books, Radio chat shows and a host of other media outlets and it will surely continue.
One cannot help but be moved to sympathy and one should similarly be moved to praise for a very sound reason.
The mind-boggling amount of expense it has taken (to date) in proving that it DID take place, is a credit to the tenacity of the Jew and should serve as an example to us all that, great capital can be made out of misfortune as easily as it can out of good fortune.
If it did NOT take place, the Jew should be allowed to insist it did since they have paid enough to prove it.
Now can we have some peace and forget about it ?.
there is only a YES camp since this is the widely accepted view backed by evidence and eyewitness testimony.
The no camp is usually just anti Semitic nonsense and is not a widely accepted view at all.