The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Barbaros succesful

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Re: Barbaros succesful

Postby kurupetos » Tue Nov 25, 2014 11:44 pm

Lordo wrote:
kurupetos wrote:
Lordo wrote:since 1963 the man in charge of gc national guard has been greek from greece. any ideas why, is there not a single gc that can do the job. you can a defence minister but not be in charge of the army.

nikitas you is a one shleepy sheepriot. gavole and i thought you had some sense. greece not controling cyprus indeed. its the best laugh i have had for ages. thanks, it is appreciated.

Greek from Greece or Greek from Cyprus doesn't make much of a difference, cockroach. :mrgreen:

rekse bodji reh tsillargazmeno kserodjehalo.

ammarekso esuni ennabais stin Mongolia... :wink: :mrgreen:
User avatar
kurupetos
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18855
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Cyprus

Re: Barbaros succesful

Postby Mustiejodu » Sat Jan 24, 2015 12:12 am

Nikitas wrote:Remember the interviews of the Shah of Iran on BBC before he got crushed? Same vein of thought. The west was soft, the people lazy, their use of resources wasteful, whereas his lot were hardy and disciplined and tough, and on and on he would rant.

All western soldiers look soft if your criteria are cell phone use. And that should cause you to stop and think. Most modern weapons systems have interfaces that depend on soldiers being familiar with devices like cell phones and computer game consoles. It gives them an edge over super disciplined automatons that are still fighting an insurgency from Kurds and not winning.

Ah, ye, and US navy seals tend to talk a lot on their cell phones too. Check out the clips on Youtube.

The more active and engaged you are in warfare the better chance and prepared you are . Did mobile phones and high technology defeat the simple afganistan fighters in the mountains . Did russia not back out of afganistan after failing to defeat them . Is the british not withdrawing now. I am sure I missed another high tech country that backed out of Afghanistan. Nikita would you label the Ira as a insurgency or terrorists ? What about The isis ? Or is anyone that kills turks not terrorists to you? Please enlighten the audience with your wisdom . Your views are dainted by hate and should not be taken as a matter of fact but should be ignored and labelled as basic propaganda and malice towards a specific race (turks)
Mustiejodu
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 713
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2014 8:02 am

Re: Barbaros succesful

Postby Nikitas » Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:45 am

You fight to expel an invader you are a rebel, you fight to enslave you are a terrorist. In our case it is clear who was what and which period in our history. And there is no doubt as to the nature of the situation since 1974.

One more detail, the GCs fought and resisted the Greeks and their local allies who carried out the coup. Which negates the charge of "you wanted to gift the island" etc etc. On the other hand, the north was gifted to Turkey and colonists welcomed with open arms, and there has always been hard bargaining for them to remain post a solution, along with the foreign army that invaded in 1974. The degrees of gifting are evident in each case.
Nikitas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7420
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:49 pm

Re: Barbaros succesful

Postby Mustiejodu » Wed Jan 28, 2015 9:14 pm

So what was your group of people called in 1963 ? The ones that killed british soldiers . What were those that masacred TC villages called . What title would you like to give them?
Mustiejodu
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 713
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2014 8:02 am

Re: Barbaros succesful

Postby Get Real! » Wed Jan 28, 2015 9:29 pm

Mustiejodu wrote:So what was your group of people called in 1963 ? The ones that killed british soldiers . What were those that masacred TC villages called . What title would you like to give them?

Freedom fighters!

Ask an obvious question and get an obvious answer... :)
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Re: Barbaros succesful

Postby Jerry » Thu Feb 12, 2015 10:14 pm

Since the ROC has already said that the TCs will be entitled to a share of natural gas pending a solution does this mean the Barbaros is going to withdraw. I find this hard to believe, there must be a cunning ploy somewhere in Bozkir's statement.


Turkish EU Minister and the Chief Negotiator Volkan Bozkır has said that Turkey was ready to withdraw the Barbaros Hayreddin Paşa vessel if the Greek Cypriot side accepts that natural gas belongs to both peoples of the island.

http://www.kpdailynews.com/index.php/ca ... LOCAL_NEWS
Jerry
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4730
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: UK

Re: Barbaros succesful

Postby Lordo » Thu Feb 12, 2015 11:44 pm

just saying they are entitled to a share is not exactly a promise. where is the percentage of the share. o.ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo1 per cent is also a share. are you kidding. the real question is in the original agreement tcs were entitled to 30 percent of everything shared. will the gcs honour it or not. that is the question.
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 22326
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free. Walk on Swine walk on

Re: Barbaros succesful

Postby Jerry » Thu Feb 12, 2015 11:56 pm

Lordo wrote:just saying they are entitled to a share is not exactly a promise. where is the percentage of the share. o.ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo1 per cent is also a share. are you kidding. the real question is in the original agreement tcs were entitled to 30 percent of everything shared. will the gcs honour it or not. that is the question.


So according to you each TC should get a bigger share than a Greek Cypriot, I know you think you are God's chosen people but how come you get more?
Jerry
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4730
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: UK

Re: Barbaros succesful

Postby Lordo » Sun Feb 15, 2015 3:10 pm

Jerry wrote:
Lordo wrote:just saying they are entitled to a share is not exactly a promise. where is the percentage of the share. o.ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo1 per cent is also a share. are you kidding. the real question is in the original agreement tcs were entitled to 30 percent of everything shared. will the gcs honour it or not. that is the question.


So according to you each TC should get a bigger share than a Greek Cypriot, I know you think you are God's chosen people but how come you get more?

where did i say tcs deserve more than gcs charluimu, i just want the agreement to be made public so we know where we stand. will the groc respect the roc agreement regarding resources or not. if there is no agreement on resources from 1960 then surely this is the time to write one keeping the roc spirit alive. assuming that you would like to keep the roc intact as opposed to two independent states.
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 22326
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free. Walk on Swine walk on

Re: Barbaros succesful

Postby Jerry » Sun Feb 15, 2015 3:42 pm

Lordo wrote:
Jerry wrote:
Lordo wrote:just saying they are entitled to a share is not exactly a promise. where is the percentage of the share. o.ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo1 per cent is also a share. are you kidding. the real question is in the original agreement tcs were entitled to 30 percent of everything shared. will the gcs honour it or not. that is the question.


So according to you each TC should get a bigger share than a Greek Cypriot, I know you think you are God's chosen people but how come you get more?

where did i say tcs deserve more than gcs charluimu, i just want the agreement to be made public so we know where we stand. will the groc respect the roc agreement regarding resources or not. if there is no agreement on resources from 1960 then surely this is the time to write one keeping the roc spirit alive. assuming that you would like to keep the roc intact as opposed to two independent states.


The brain (do you really have one?) still isn't working is it? 30% for 18% of the population is more for each Turkish Cypriot, or its constituent State, if there ever is one, than the Greek Cypriots would receive. Get it?
Jerry
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4730
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: UK

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests