Nikitas wrote:There is NO RIGHT AT ALL for Turkey from her status as guarantor. A guarantor is not a co-owner, and if it is then Greece has a share, which would make things interesting for us all. Turkey relinquished her guarantor status from the moment she ceased to recognise the RoC anyway.
Guaranteeing independence means reinforcing the rights of Cyprus to her natural resources, not challenging them.
As for the TCs rights, they depend on whether they want Taksim-Enosis with another power or if they still want one unitary Cypriot state. Till then their rights are suspended. This is pretty much the attitude of the international community who were convinced all these years by the TC demands for separation and are now totally confused about joint ownership of resources clearly in the south.
It was our mistake not to give you Taksim to the hilt in 1974. And be rid of this malingering misery of a "special needs" community moaning and groaning about everything while refusing to contribute the slightest in any meaningful way.
You are one confused bugger, it was the mess up until 1974 that gave Turkey the right to intervene and find a solution to the mishandindling of the "RoC" by the GCs that only worked for GCs and discriminated against TCs trying its hardest to take away their rights as per agreements signed by the GCs. So Turkeys presence here remains in your hands, you will not agree to any solution put before you, you do not want time tables and you run away form the negotiating table at every opportunity. We support BBF with political equality, do you?