Paphitis wrote:Get Real! wrote:Paphitis wrote:The CIA can say a lot of things, but what can be legally achieved with the consent of Congress is another matter completely.
There are a lot of rules in regard to this and supplying Al Nusra because they oppose Assad is something that can't be done.
You sad little fuck... you should listen when I say that you're a waste of space!
By NOT opening your mouth it would’ve saved you HUNDREDS of embarrassing moments!
What makes you so incorrigible?
You’re like Homer Simpson who kept sticking his finger in a power outlet and getting electrocuted because he couldn’t understand it!
Look, you have been living in the "Center of the Universe" for far too long but reality dictates that the supply of Arms from countries like the US and Australia is heavily regulated and controlled and for good reason. We will not provide arms which will be used by rebels to terrorize Syrian or Iraqi civilians. It can't be done.
There are many nuances which can bring down an entire US or Australian Government if it was proven that militant groups in Syria or Iraq were supplied covertly with our weapons so much so that even a simple airdrop of arms to the Peshmerga was only done after consulting the best lawyers and consultants in the country and still the PM was forced to provide assurances to the Australian Parliament and People. If he lied, then God help him.
We can't even sell the RoC any weapons let alone Islamic Militants.
You’re wasting your breath with BOLLOCKS and it’s not gonna save you!
Just retreat and be quiet and don’t ever doubt me when I say something because unlike you, I’m always well read.