So Britain and the US has spent 3 years arming all these different factions to topple Assad and having failed they’ll now go bomb… not Assad, but the failed factions!
Pure genius!
It must be some kind of reverse asymmetric warfare!
Get Real! wrote:So Britain and the US has spent 3 years arming all these different factions to topple Assad and having failed they’ll now go bomb… not Assad, but the failed factions!
Pure genius!
It must be some kind of reverse asymmetric warfare!
Paphitis wrote:The US has not armed any Syrian Militants to topple Assad.
In June 2012, the Central Intelligence Agency was reported to be involved in covert operations along the Turkish-Syrian border, where agents investigated rebel groups, recommending arms providers which groups to give aid to. Agents also helped opposition forces develop supply routes, and provided them with communications training.[75] CIA operatives distributed assault rifles, anti-tank rocket launchers and other ammunition to Syrian opposition. The State Department has reportedly allocated $15 million for civilian opposition groups in Syria.[10]
In July 2012, the United States government granted a non-governmental organization called Syrian Support Group a license to fund the Free Syrian Army...
Get Real! wrote:Paphitis wrote:The US has not armed any Syrian Militants to topple Assad.
Idiot, are you trying to reinvent history?In June 2012, the Central Intelligence Agency was reported to be involved in covert operations along the Turkish-Syrian border, where agents investigated rebel groups, recommending arms providers which groups to give aid to. Agents also helped opposition forces develop supply routes, and provided them with communications training.[75] CIA operatives distributed assault rifles, anti-tank rocket launchers and other ammunition to Syrian opposition. The State Department has reportedly allocated $15 million for civilian opposition groups in Syria.[10]
In July 2012, the United States government granted a non-governmental organization called Syrian Support Group a license to fund the Free Syrian Army...
I'm sure you can read the entire section yourself… although I wouldn't be surprised if you don't understand it!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_in ... _Civil_War
Paphitis wrote:Oh yes I am sure Wikipedia would know exactly what the CIA was up to.
Did it also report that you're an idiot?
Do you understand that the supply of Western Arms to rebels is prohibited. Australian PM had to re-assure parliament that Australia was not supplying the Peshmerga with Australian Arms which is why they got Russian made weapons. Do you think we don't have enough arms to supply them with? We do but it can't be done and the same applies to the US.
Get Real! wrote:Paphitis wrote:Oh yes I am sure Wikipedia would know exactly what the CIA was up to.
Did it also report that you're an idiot?
Do you understand that the supply of Western Arms to rebels is prohibited. Australian PM had to re-assure parliament that Australia was not supplying the Peshmerga with Australian Arms which is why they got Russian made weapons. Do you think we don't have enough arms to supply them with? We do but it can't be done and the same applies to the US.
How many times do I have to make a fool out of you?
From 2011: U.S. admits funding Syrian opposition
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/u-s-admits ... n-1.987112
And throughout the following years of course:
C.I.A. Said to Aid in Steering Arms to Syrian Opposition
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/21/world ... d=all&_r=0
US, Israel supporting Syrian rebels from Turkey
http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/US-Isr ... rom-Turkey
Cash boost for Syrian rebels to pressure Assad
http://www.thenational.ae/world/syria/c ... sure-assad
Barack Obama seeks $500m to fund moderate Syrian rebels
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... ebels.html
US Funds, Trains And Arms The 'Moderate Opposition' In Syria
http://www.ibtimes.com/us-funds-trains- ... ls-1685180
But you love it when I rub your face in the manure eh… that’s how I’ve trained you!
Paphitis wrote:The CIA can say a lot of things, but what can be legally achieved with the consent of Congress is another matter completely.
There are a lot of rules in regard to this and supplying Al Nusra because they oppose Assad is something that can't be done.
Get Real! wrote:Paphitis wrote:The CIA can say a lot of things, but what can be legally achieved with the consent of Congress is another matter completely.
There are a lot of rules in regard to this and supplying Al Nusra because they oppose Assad is something that can't be done.
You sad little fuck... you should listen when I say that you're a waste of space!
By NOT opening your mouth it would’ve saved you HUNDREDS of embarrassing moments!
What makes you so incorrigible?
You’re like Homer Simpson who kept sticking his finger in a power outlet and getting electrocuted because he couldn’t understand it!
Get Real! wrote:Paphitis wrote:The CIA can say a lot of things, but what can be legally achieved with the consent of Congress is another matter completely.
There are a lot of rules in regard to this and supplying Al Nusra because they oppose Assad is something that can't be done.
You sad little fuck... you should listen when I say that you're a waste of space!
By NOT opening your mouth it would’ve saved you HUNDREDS of embarrassing moments!
What makes you so incorrigible?
You’re like Homer Simpson who kept sticking his finger in a power outlet and getting electrocuted because he couldn’t understand it!
Return to Politics and Elections
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest