kurupetos wrote:Lordo wrote:well yeah and you boys spent most of your history under the osmanli. you are more terkish than the tcs in cyprus.
Why don't you love us then?
Its a love hate thing.
kurupetos wrote:Lordo wrote:well yeah and you boys spent most of your history under the osmanli. you are more terkish than the tcs in cyprus.
Why don't you love us then?
Viewpoint wrote:kurupetos wrote:Lordo wrote:well yeah and you boys spent most of your history under the osmanli. you are more terkish than the tcs in cyprus.
Why don't you love us then?
Its a love hate thing.
Nikitas wrote:Influence as in founding grand institutions of learning? Which ones would these be? Can you point to any grand university founded and flourishing in the greater Ottoman empire? Next door in Europe at that time they were going through the Renaissance, but none of that filtered through to the bimbachis. Like one Lebanese friend puts it, "the Turks made us collectively stupid, they erased what that the Arabs had created". Contrast the advance of the Dodecanese in just thirty years of Italian rule with the preceding centuries of Turkish neglect and you get the idea of the "influence" the Turks had in the territories they occupied and the people they conquered.
The British were in Cyprus for less than a century and they left behind a complete legal system and a viable public administration. There is not one single former Ottoman region that retained either the legal or administrative system used during the Ottoman reign. Even Turkey copied foreign legal codes. So what influence was left by the Ottomans, Omanlis, Seljuks etc.
You do not have to go far, look around you at the kitschness in the north. That should be enough evidence of the "influence"..
repulsewarrior wrote:...isn't it the Ottomans that refined Bureaucracy, and, Diplomacy, to what it is today?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests