by Nikitas » Fri Aug 08, 2014 4:47 pm
They had interpreters, but the workmen apparently spoke a dialect, that the interpreter, (provided by the embassy), was not fluent in. The authorities and the embassy only found out about the languate problem AFTER the verdict when the interpreter told reporters.
Democracy is no shield against incompetence. A first year law student would have known enough to get the right interpreter and would have brough only the charges supported by the evidence and not tried to make a bigger deal out of it. The charges of trafficking were simply not supported by the evidence, the wounding was, and it should have been enough. But Greeks wanted to make legal history with the trafficking charge. They did, but not the way they expected, jurors cannot be fooled all the time.