Cyprus-Forum.com

by **zan** » Fri Jun 27, 2014 4:29 pm

Sotos wrote:
zan wrote:
Sotos wrote:EU is a club of countries that joined voluntarily their own territories. How is that related to Cyprus??? The whole territory of Cyprus belongs to the Cypriots while the north is illegally occupied by foreigners. So it should be 100% to the Cypriots, 0% to the foreign invaders.

Makarios "joined" voluntarily to a partnership in 1960.

A "partnership" were you are the minor "partners" with no right to rule ANY part of Cyprus since the WHOLE of Cyprus can be ruled ONLY by a native Cypriot.

I think you are a little confused with numbers of people and political rights. Go back and have another look. The native donkeys were not present at the signing so they missed out. I do believe they have been given their own patch now somewhere in the karpaz area so they are pretty happy with their lot :lol:

by **Sotos** » Fri Jun 27, 2014 4:38 pm

zan wrote:
Sotos wrote:
zan wrote:
Sotos wrote:EU is a club of countries that joined voluntarily their own territories. How is that related to Cyprus??? The whole territory of Cyprus belongs to the Cypriots while the north is illegally occupied by foreigners. So it should be 100% to the Cypriots, 0% to the foreign invaders.

Makarios "joined" voluntarily to a partnership in 1960.

A "partnership" were you are the minor "partners" with no right to rule ANY part of Cyprus since the WHOLE of Cyprus can be ruled ONLY by a native Cypriot.

I think you are a little confused with numbers of people and political rights. Go back and have another look. The native donkeys were not present at the signing so they missed out. I do believe they have been given their own patch now somewhere in the karpaz area so they are pretty happy with their lot

No confusion at all. The agreements were very clear that Cyprus can not be divided in any way and that the whole Cyprus can be ruled only by a Greek Cypriot president.

by **zan** » Fri Jun 27, 2014 4:39 pm

What about the donkeys.... The poor poor donkeys

by **boulio** » Fri Jun 27, 2014 4:54 pm

zan were in the 1960 treaty does it say gc and tc communties are partners?

by **zan** » Fri Jun 27, 2014 5:07 pm

boulio wrote:zan were in the 1960 treaty does it say gc and tc communties are partners?

From about the beginning to the end. If you are asking for a specific word then see a lawyer

by **boulio** » Fri Jun 27, 2014 6:00 pm

i cant find it maybe you can help

by **zan** » Fri Jun 27, 2014 6:01 pm

boulio wrote:i cant find it maybe you can help

I refer you to the answer I gave a while ago :roll:

by **boulio** » Fri Jun 27, 2014 6:03 pm

what asnwer?

by **zan** » Fri Jun 27, 2014 6:04 pm

zan wrote:
boulio wrote:zan were in the 1960 treaty does it say gc and tc communties are partners?

From about the beginning to the end. If you are asking for a specific word then see a lawyer