by Nikitas » Wed Jun 25, 2014 3:27 pm
A- the GC side has not introduced the Ankara protocols (allowing Cyprus registered ships and planes in Turkish space) in the intercommunal talks.
B- The TC demand for two commissioners is basically asking the GC side to change the rules of the EU which involve 27 other independent nations and the fundamental structure of the EU. If the GC side had the power to bring about such changes, like compelling Germany, France, the UK, to do GC bidding, we would not need to enter into negotiations with anyone over anything!
C- Anyone who thinks that the present territorial situation can ever be legalised is dreaming or is a racist asshole who thinks that one community can have twice the per capita territory of all the others.
There is one possibility I do not want to consider, that the TCs actually believe you can storm into an EU heads of state meeting and put such a demand on the table! Is it really possible a negotiator can be that dumb?
The other explanation is to demand the impossible, to lead the talks to failure blamed on the "other side", in which case would be who? Obviously not the GCs, who cannot change zilch in the EU, not the EU since it is not in the talks, not the major EU nations., so who would be the culprit other than the one who thought of the demand!
The situation reminds me of the Greek saying, about the zucchini rising up to f**** the grocer.