Maximus wrote:Paphitis wrote:Maximus wrote:I do not think you are right. really.
At best, I think you mean well are being naïve and lead like a lamb to slaughter..
I think you need to be less cynical because the fact is there is genuine concern when countries like Cyprus, Greece, Italy, Spain or Portugal go under. There are no winners in these scenarios just losers all round and the people suffer too.
there is nothing the Bankers can take that can in any way pay for what was lost from their perspective, and even the Troika is a big loser because they need to provide a haircut (lost money) and bail out (cheap as chips loan).
and the money for these bribes and cheap as chips loans was created by these bankers out of thin air and forced on to the suffering people like a scorching hot potato..
how can you say now, that there is genuine concern, when a few pages back you say Greece has little to offer? why the concern?some other country that has a lot more to offer because Greece never really had much to begin with.
These cheap loans were necessary to pay out expensive loans that Greece took out from private Bankers of which some had a very high interest rate of up to 17%. It was either this or total bankruptcy and Government shut down.
In the end, no one can be held responsible to Greece's mismanagement other than its own Governments.
Aside from this, Greece received a haircut of 130 billion Euro which translates to 30% of its GDP. This is an enormous leg up.
Haircut = a creditor write down of debt. In other words 130 billion was written off and the creditors had to undertake the losses to their Balance Sheet.
A haircut was something which Cyprus sadly did not get. In fact, Cypriot Banks had a 10 Billion Euro write share of the Greek Haircut which is a huge catastrophe and that translates to 40% of the RoC's GDP.
Cyprus should have at least had an 8 Billion Euro haircut. I blame the stupid AKEL Government for not negotiating and leaving things until it was too late.