TC negotiator Orsai gave an interview to Athens daily Kathimerini a few days ago. Asked about the application of the EU aquis he gave the rationalisation of a "viable state" noting that it is just not possible to accept the basic freedoms if that will mean too many GCs in the north. Even if the GC residents exercise their political rights in the GC state, he said, their mere presence would render the TC state non viable.
There is a fundamentally false assumption there, and this assumption has been plaguing the TC position and thereby the talks for ever. The false assumption is that post settlement they will be able to control the TC population as to the choice of residence. Exactly how Orsai can fathom that some, perhaps many, possibly even the majority, ot TCs will not opt to move south? What would prevent them? If it is the TCs that move out, and not the GCs moving in to the TC statelet what does that do to "viability"?
This kind of approach, combined with the twists and turns re the presidency, the EU aquis in general and above all the territory and properties issue is telling. It shows that the TC side is not approaching the talks with any understanding about the meaning of federation, or even confederation. And as we saw over the gas finds in the far south EEZ, Turkey is not ready even for partition, the solution they have been pushing for decades.
Someone obviously needs a fundamental change of mind here.