gardash wrote:http://www.kpdailynews.com/index.php/cat/67/news/1073/PageName/LOCAL_NEWS?fb_action_ids=10152432640438258&fb_action_types=og.likes
gardash wrote:But is it the thin end of the wedge?
What next, now the ice has been broken by one of the most respected carriers in the world?
gardash wrote:So are you implying that "indirect" flights to Ercan, via Turkey, by BA are OK?
Sotos wrote:gardash wrote:So are you implying that "indirect" flights to Ercan, via Turkey, by BA are OK?
No flight to that illegal airport is OK. If it is indirect through Turkey it might be harder to convict them ... but since it is EU airline I think it is still possible for RoC to make them regret their wrong choice! But in any case don't expect regular BA flights to the pseudo state.
B25 wrote:Sotos wrote:gardash wrote:So are you implying that "indirect" flights to Ercan, via Turkey, by BA are OK?
No flight to that illegal airport is OK. If it is indirect through Turkey it might be harder to convict them ... but since it is EU airline I think it is still possible for RoC to make them regret their wrong choice! But in any case don't expect regular BA flights to the pseudo state.
Soto, they think because they privately chartered a BA plane it makes them recognised
gardash wrote:B25 wrote:Sotos wrote:gardash wrote:So are you implying that "indirect" flights to Ercan, via Turkey, by BA are OK?
No flight to that illegal airport is OK. If it is indirect through Turkey it might be harder to convict them ... but since it is EU airline I think it is still possible for RoC to make them regret their wrong choice! But in any case don't expect regular BA flights to the pseudo state.
Soto, they think because they privately chartered a BA plane it makes them recognised
Wouldn't BA want to know the destination of the flight? Even if it was submitted as a flight to Turkey, the charterer could not just decide to fly on to TRNC without the express approval of BA?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests