The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Can this be true?

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Can this be true?

Postby gardash » Sat May 24, 2014 12:46 pm

gardash
Member
Member
 
Posts: 78
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 7:20 am

Re: Can this be true?

Postby B25 » Sat May 24, 2014 12:59 pm

gardash wrote:http://www.kpdailynews.com/index.php/cat/67/news/1073/PageName/LOCAL_NEWS?fb_action_ids=10152432640438258&fb_action_types=og.likes


Of course it's true, the scumbag aging DP, who couldn't make it anywhere else had to accept blood money to perform in the illegal occupied areas. Chartering a BA plane gets the Turks to jizz thinking that BA had a hand in this. Although I should hope the RoC authorities might take some legal action against someone.

May all of the DP band go to hell.
User avatar
B25
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6543
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:03 pm
Location: ** Classified **

Re: Can this be true?

Postby gardash » Sun May 25, 2014 7:08 am

But is it the thin end of the wedge?
What next, now the ice has been broken by one of the most respected carriers in the world?
gardash
Member
Member
 
Posts: 78
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 7:20 am

Re: Can this be true?

Postby Sotos » Sun May 25, 2014 7:28 am

gardash wrote:But is it the thin end of the wedge?
What next, now the ice has been broken by one of the most respected carriers in the world?


If it was a direct flight then expect BA to be taken to courts and pay a heavy fine.
User avatar
Sotos
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 11357
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 2:50 am

Re: Can this be true?

Postby gardash » Sun May 25, 2014 7:35 am

So are you implying that "indirect" flights to Ercan, via Turkey, by BA are OK?
gardash
Member
Member
 
Posts: 78
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 7:20 am

Re: Can this be true?

Postby Sotos » Sun May 25, 2014 7:41 am

gardash wrote:So are you implying that "indirect" flights to Ercan, via Turkey, by BA are OK?


No flight to that illegal airport is OK. If it is indirect through Turkey it might be harder to convict them ... but since it is EU airline I think it is still possible for RoC to make them regret their wrong choice! But in any case don't expect regular BA flights to the pseudo state.
User avatar
Sotos
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 11357
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 2:50 am

Re: Can this be true?

Postby B25 » Sun May 25, 2014 9:01 am

Sotos wrote:
gardash wrote:So are you implying that "indirect" flights to Ercan, via Turkey, by BA are OK?


No flight to that illegal airport is OK. If it is indirect through Turkey it might be harder to convict them ... but since it is EU airline I think it is still possible for RoC to make them regret their wrong choice! But in any case don't expect regular BA flights to the pseudo state.


Soto, they think because they privately chartered a BA plane it makes them recognised :lol: :lol:
User avatar
B25
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6543
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:03 pm
Location: ** Classified **

Re: Can this be true?

Postby gardash » Sun May 25, 2014 2:07 pm

B25 wrote:
Sotos wrote:
gardash wrote:So are you implying that "indirect" flights to Ercan, via Turkey, by BA are OK?


No flight to that illegal airport is OK. If it is indirect through Turkey it might be harder to convict them ... but since it is EU airline I think it is still possible for RoC to make them regret their wrong choice! But in any case don't expect regular BA flights to the pseudo state.


Soto, they think because they privately chartered a BA plane it makes them recognised :lol: :lol:

Wouldn't BA want to know the destination of the flight? Even if it was submitted as a flight to Turkey, the charterer could not just decide to fly on to TRNC without the express approval of BA?
gardash
Member
Member
 
Posts: 78
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 7:20 am

Re: Can this be true?

Postby B25 » Sun May 25, 2014 2:54 pm

gardash wrote:
B25 wrote:
Sotos wrote:
gardash wrote:So are you implying that "indirect" flights to Ercan, via Turkey, by BA are OK?


No flight to that illegal airport is OK. If it is indirect through Turkey it might be harder to convict them ... but since it is EU airline I think it is still possible for RoC to make them regret their wrong choice! But in any case don't expect regular BA flights to the pseudo state.


Soto, they think because they privately chartered a BA plane it makes them recognised :lol: :lol:

Wouldn't BA want to know the destination of the flight? Even if it was submitted as a flight to Turkey, the charterer could not just decide to fly on to TRNC without the express approval of BA?


Here is how the plane booking took place:

DP: we want to charter one of your planes to go earn some bloody money. No one wants us anymore so we have to go where the crooks tell us

BA: ok when for

DP: 25 May

BA: destination

DP: illegally occupied trashcan state

BA: oh dear, not sure if we can do that.

DP: oh, but we'll touch down in Turkey then fly on

BA well i suppose thats ok then, but as long as you can bend the rules then i guess its ok then

BA: btw, i just spoke to someone at the Foriegn office and they said, fuck tye GCs just let them have it and take the bloody money.

DP: ha ha, every one will now think we solved the direct flights issue.

In the background the sound of TCs jizzing their pants can be heard

Furtherback, the laughter of GCs can be heard, saying ti malakes, and all this whilst the RoC goverment are sat hiding holding their balls.

DP may you rot in hell.
User avatar
B25
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6543
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:03 pm
Location: ** Classified **

Re: Can this be true?

Postby Viewpoint » Sun May 25, 2014 5:15 pm

Concert was a great success, ask the GCs that attended.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Next

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests