Maximus wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Maximus wrote:VP
A unitary state is a state governed as one single unit in which the central government is supreme and any administrative divisions (subnational units) exercise only powers that their central government chooses to delegate. The great majority of states in the world have a unitary system of government.
taken straight from wikipedia, simple.
Do you understand this is not the model of state which is on offer? Its a two state solution under a federal joint governing body under a constitution which cannot unilaterally be changed? please get that into your head because its very frustrating when we are all saying oranges and you are saying bananas.
Its not a two state solution. This is what is on offer,
its going to be two administrative regions (subnational units) that exercise only those powers that the central government gives them. UN resolutions retroactive, full EU member state, democracy, one citizenship, one international personality, one president, one halloumi, respecting international law, peoples rights to property and ownership, retroactive. Respecting their demographic rights, freedom of expression etc...
whats the problem?
Looks like you are one confused indiviual but something tells me you are purposely pursueing maximilistic demands of a unitary state where the GCs rule supreme and TCs lose all their rights as per the 1960 agreements and reduce themselves down to minorty status at the mercy of revenge seeking GCs. This is not going to happen because we will never allow it, so wise up and understand its BBF with political equality or nothing.....from what I read from your posts nothing is the best option for you as placing you and people like you with reach of TCs would be a disaster and very dangerous for TCs.