Viewpoint wrote:Maximus wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Maximus wrote:Viewpoint wrote:So you now agree that the EU is not impartial be it good or bad? then you agree with Özersay.
I agree that the EU is not impartial but this does not mean I have to agree with Ozersay. The EU's impartiality is right and correct, Ozersay's is wrong and incorrect.
But you do agree with Özersay, he claims they are not impartial and so do you...that makes them a party which is never acceptable in negotiations as it brings about an unfiar advantage to one side. Thats why you see no problems because its favors your side.
NO, I completely disagree with Ozersay and completely agree with the EU.
The EU are treating the TC's fairly but Ozersay is not treating the EU or the GC's fairly at all.
Make up your mind you just stated for everyone to read the EU cannot be impartial because you are a member and a side to the Cyprus problem, thats the exact same thing that Özersay is saying...so you agree bloody hell its not rocket science. The point you make excuses for is that act in your favor so of course you claim they are right.
I was momentarily confused, however, what Ozersay is proposing will never work. He is basically acting like a sneak and trying to cement partition contrary to EU and international laws, with the EU's help and money of course, while trying to keep them in the dark. Ozersay is naïve at best and a complete plank at worst if he expects the EU to take him seriously. He is basically a carbon copy of Erdogan and we all know how well that is going with the EU. This is probably how the EU see it too.
Can you answer the question I posed earlier? How is his proposition to the EU going to motivate the GC's towards a solution, when it does not address or reconcile the TC's position of illegality or anything that matters to the GC's or the EU regarding the Cyprus problem.