boomerang wrote: ...but still we felt obligated as the law would have dictated and as word of the mouth advertising by return business...
If you think your local laws mandate that netgear provide indefinite phone line technical support for a 100 usd product then you should report them to a local consumer protection body. I personally seriously doubt your local lwas require such of netgear.
boomerang wrote:As sotos said not only not willing to help but they did not even pointed me to the right direction...all they wanted was 6 and 12 month extra support...that was their objective...read my complain letter for them but then again lack of comprehension skills are eluding you to the point you are now reading minds....
They needed to tell you that there was free online product support on their website for you to know this ? You rang asking for phone based technical support. They explained that this was not available for free on a product of your type and age and if you wanted such support it would cost and what the prices were. Sure they could have said or for free you can consult our website - but really did they need to say that for you to know it ? If you expected them at this point to diagnose your issue and give you the specific support page on the website you needed, then once more you were expecting free lifetime technical support to which you were not entitled and netgear had no responsibility to deliver.
boomerang wrote:so no I did not enter this just to save $120...and get a free router...you must be nuts thinking of this...I am not hard over $120...especially when I am pleading with them for 2 fucking hrs for help...
I never said your motivation was to get a new router and not have to pay for it. I said what you did was criminal and tant amount to stealing a new router and admitting such on a public forum is always stupid. It may not have been your motivation but it was the end result none the less. You had a three year old 'broken' router. You ended up with a new working one at no cost.
boomerang wrote: ....actually the new router upon entering the menu it tells you there is new firmware and if you want to upgrade...I asked this question in my letter for advice and clarification...again they did not suggest anything...in the old router you had to manually check as the software did not connect directly to the netgear servers....
I do not know the exact model and firmware version you are now using but on every such firmware I have seen that has such an auto detect feature also has a check box option to turn off the detection of new firmware on log in as well.
boomerang wrote:now I am pissed because the new router is connected to the netgear servers...security gone as far as I am concerned...not that they can't get in other ways...but so obvious, we are just not happy with it...
Here you are just being paranoid. In terms of network security having the router automatically check if there is a new firmware at log in is no different from doing it manually either from the routers own web interface or directly from their website on a PC connected to your network.
boomerang wrote:today we took the decision to trash the netgear products and instead go with D-Link...restoring at least some security....so again erol you are wrong in thinking my motivation was to get a "freebie"....as now we are facing a bigger challenge and greater expense in purchasing new equipment at a cost but atleast feeling more comfortable...
I never said you I thought your motivation was to get a freebie. I said what you did was tant amount to theft and it is. I said posting about committing such an act publically is always stupid.
boomerang wrote:...you say I broke the law and you might be right on saying this
I am right about this and it seems you are finally if grudgingly accepting this fact.
boomerang wrote:...there are always 2 sides to every coin and as far as the law is concerned both sides can be right...
Unless it involves disputed property in north Cyprus post 74 presumably , in which case there is only one side of the coin and one right - yours.
boomerang wrote:re-read my letter to them again and again...time will tell as they have my details...so stealing obviously was not the objective here because a thief generally does not really trails behind as who he is...but to you this was the objective...you are a fool for even going there...
Where do I say I think your objective and motivation was to try and get a new router for no cost ? Again having dragged the status of the property in Cyprus I live in into the discussion and branded me a and my father a thief, you do not seem to use the same standards to us as you state above re leaving trails etc - yet you seem to think theft was and is my motivation ?
boomerang wrote:In any case we decided to trash the netgear products and look for alternatives as we do not feel comfortable netgear snooping around via a direct connection to our servers...so there you have it...money was not the objective as we do not feel comfortable in this...
Once more that the router can contact netgears servers to see if there is an updated firmware automatically does not compromise YOUR servers any more than they are compromised by your ability to do it manually.
boomerang wrote:on a side note you yourself is breaking the law by residing on land that does not belong to you....we have judgements on this and I side Mr and Mrs Orams, were evicted from the land that they build a house on...does this mean you are a thief because you stated this in your forum you inherited your house from your dad and indeed belong to a GC, in other words your dad was peddling in stolen goods?...well according to the law you are...no ifs no buts on this one...why are you still hanging on something that does not belong to you?...it can quite rightly applied that the apple doesn't fall far from the tree?...hmm
Firstly and for the umpteenth time, the house I inherited from my father was never a GC house or home, nor did the land it was built on ever hold such a GC house or home. It was built after 74, prior to 74 the land was used for grazing goats. Yes it was built on disputed land and yes my father bought the house knowing this. It does seem that your 'standards' for determining a thief vary depending on if you are applying them to you or to someone else. You claimed you were not a thief because you had no gain. Yet the same can be argued about the house in question. It was bought at a price that reflected the disputed nature of the deeds to the land it was on and its value today also reflects this reality. Nor is it clear that a case like the Orams one would have the same result post the ECHR ruling on the legitimacy of the IPC which happened after the Orams case. It may make no difference but then again it may, yet when there are according to you always two sides to any legal dispute, you seem to be judge jury and executioner in this case, claiming there are no ifs and no buts. For the record I have always argued that if the status of the land that house is on goes from disputed title to non disputed title as part of a general settlement, then the increase in its value that results from this change in status should not accrue to me but should in fact go into a fund to balance against other land claims and settlements. Anyway as GR has pointed out all this is pretty off topic and irrelevant to the thread in question, You may think me a hypocrite but even if I am it does not change what you chose to do and what that represents.
If this thread is really about helping others learn from your experiences then I think there are valid lessons that can be drawn from this saga, but they are not in my opinion about 'standing up to mega corporations' or the validity of resorting to illegal acts. I think the kind of lessons that could be learnt from this saga include the following.
1 - Updating firmware is NOT a trivial thing. It is NOT the same as updating software or drivers. Firmware means somewhere between software and hardware. Updating firmware ALWAYS carries a potential risk of 'bricking' the device concerned. If you think you have a specific need to update firmware do your research first. Check the changelogs for the new firmware - does it address the specific problem you have or not. Check for the experience of others that have tried updating their firmwares - have others had problems and if so is it known why and how to avoid them. Check for what you do if it does go wrong before you try updating the firmware.
2 - Expecting lifetime technical support on a 100usd home product is not reasonable. Try the customer support helpline by all means but if it does not provide the answers you are looking for then your time and effort is probably better spent searching online for answers and asking on forums like these than spending hours and hours trying to argue with the company concerned that they should provide you with lifte time technical support on a 100usd domestic IT product like a router.