Paphitis wrote:Pyrpolizer wrote:Looking at the work the other professors presented (really dreadfully more advanced than mine but hey I can be excused because Physics is not what I studied) I have no doubt that Professor Jayson Taylor would add even more depth and more accurate analysis. If you want to know at what depth just read his last sentence.
Yet he refused to participate for the same reason i kept on shouting in this forum.(were's the data i.e)
Here's what he said on facebook.
https://www.facebook.com/jasontaylor777 ... 7479552158wrote:
Nobody likes getting stale data and news, but that is what is going on with MH370. Who owns the MH370 data? Why isn’t it Creative Commons or copyleft? Is it right that the data be horded by MAS or the other dozen or so entities involved, with tiny fragments of it sporadically spoon fed to the public? Why aren’t the families' lawyers asking judges for subpoenas of all flight data? I’m glad one entity has finally started to demand it, and don't see the need for any secrecy here.
P.S. I don't follow this Doppler stuff, so I'd like to see that data too. Most receivers I know about can't store small frequency shifts like that. It just weakens the signal amplitude. Don't let this get over your head. You know this too. Incidentally, most of the velocity has to be transverse, which is an extra factor of beta/2=v/(2c) down and can be ignored. (It's from time dilation in special relativity.)
Of course we 've had that satellite Engineer telling us all that stuff I posted before.
Is that right!
Inmarsat have released the data and it has not been challenged by any serious "academic" or physics professor.
In fact, Boeing and Airbus have also confirmed the findings.
Inmarsat was only within coverage of 1 Satellite which is not surprising die to the remoteness of the area. Inmarsat analysed the Doppler Shift of the pings of MH370 and it moved away or towards the Satellite and compared this to other aircraft thus being able to define an approximate position.To work out which direction was taken by flight MH370, Inmarsat, working with the UK’s Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB), says it used some clever analysis of the Doppler effect. The Doppler effect describes the change in frequency (the Doppler shift) as a sound/light/radio source travels towards the listener, and then again as it moves away. The most common example is the change in frequency of a police or fire truck siren as it passes you. Radio waves, such as the pings transmitted by flight MH370, are also subject to the Doppler effect.
Basically, Inmarsat 4-F1′s longitude wobbles slightly during its orbit. This wobble, if you know what you’re looking for, creates enough variation in the Doppler shift that objects moving and north and south have slightly different frequencies. (If it didn’t wobble, the Doppler shift would be identical for both routes.) Inmarsat says that it looked at the satellite pings of other flights that have taken similar paths, and confirmed that the Doppler shift measurements for MH370′s pings show an “extraordinary matching” for the southern projected arc over the Indian Ocean. ”By yesterday [we] were able to definitively say that the plane had undoubtedly taken the southern route,” said Inmarsat’s Chris McLaughlin.
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/1791 ... -the-plane
It hasn't released the data, I already provided you 10s of links of what they released, and what you explained above is just parrot repeating of what they presumably explained that doesn't really make sense without the data and without proof that their only satellite was able and did in fact record ed that data.
I dont remember them mentioning Airbus, they did mention they asked some information from Boeing- Boeing declined to confirm that they saw their data, they did say they passed the data to some other company, they refused to name the company, etc etc.
Later on they said it was a sister company ...
