Cyprus-Forum.com

[Paphitis]

because they don't want anyone to know the real reasons the plane crashed.
Also for filling up their pockets and for awarding inmarsat 1 million per day profit when the time comes to impose a rule for tracking all planes in the world.
In fact this was the ONLY suggestion the Malaysian govnt included in her report.

Inmarsat always have held contracts with both Boeing and Aurbus for years!

You think it would be easy for them to come up with nonsense. You don't believe anyone in Boeing is smart enough to work it out for themselves?

Boeing and Inmarsat are not on the same team. Boeing is a client if Inmarsat as is Airbus.

[Pyrpolizer]

I already explained you a long time ago that you should visit Inmarsats Web site and see for yourself what kind of services they provide. The neither provide nor receive any services to or from Boeing or Airbus. They only provide services to Rolls Royce. This service is a MINISCULE part of their activities.

[Paphitis]

I already explained you a long time ago that you should visit Inmarsats Web site and see for yourself what kind of services they provide. The neither provide nor receive any services to or from Boeing or Airbus. They only provide services to Rolls Royce. This service is a MINISCULE part of their activities.

Oh right. Rolls Royce! Is that all?

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/ ... IE20140314

http://www.rolls-royce.com/about/techno ... ystems.jsp

Rolls Royce are a part of the International Investigation Team in Malyasia because the B777 had Rolls Royce Engines. Boeing is also a part of the IIT, because the aircraft is American.

bye bye!

Unfortunately you do not even know what you're saying. Both Boeing and Rolls Royce are fully aware of the Inmarsat findings, as is the JACC and it just so happens they all concur and agree!

Rolls Royce are fitted on about 13000 large civil aircraft worldwide - Airbus and Boeing. ACARS reports back to the Airline which in turn is reported to both Boeing and Rolls Royce who keep track of all kinds of things in order for them to issue Air Directives to all operators. Part of what they do is monitor trends for all unserviceabilities and their duty of care is to recognize problem areas which they must inform all operators and issues recommendations that certain parts need to be overhauled or replaced. Similar to a recall if you like.

http://www.rolls-royce.com/civil/produc ... eaircraft/

Now do you really think that all the Engineers and Analysts at Boeing and Rolls Royce are fools and can be played by Inmarsat?

[Pyrpolizer]

There have been 4 other serious leads that they hastly chose to ignore.
a)Vietnam has detected transponder pings from a crashing aircraft the night it was lost
b}Vietnamese Admiral report as to the approximate crash location.
c)Oil drill worker report of witnessing an aircraft going down in flames
d)Those islanders who saw a a plane flying low over their place
e)The latest lead by that company placing the crash site at the gulf of Bengal.

None has been investigated thoroughly.
Why? Because at least one of them would lead to finding the plane and reveal the reasons why it crashed.

You think they are going to continue the search in the area they are currently focused because they are certain the plane is there.
I imply you they are simply wasting public money and they will waste more for their own pockets either in the form of salaries or huge commissions.
Just wait until they assign private contractors to continue this pointless so called search.

I IMPLY YOU THEIR PURPOSE IS NOT TO FIND THE PLANE BUT TO BURY ANY CHANCE OF FINDING IT ELSEWHERE WHERE IT REALLY IS.

Yes absolutely! They are going to continue searching in the current search area because they believe that is where MH370 is. The other leads are a matter for other countries to follow up and report back. They are not within Australia's jurisdiction!

The way things evolved proved that no Country is or was in any way excited to spend millions of public money for searching for someone elses plane within their jurisdiction. Vietnam was the first one to prove that.

The only one who was always ready to do that (for obvious reasons) was Australia.
Hence the whole Inmarsat story that surprise-surprise placed the crashed plane position within their jurisdiction.
You think the Australians believe the plane is in fact there.
I already told you that I am certain the Australians know the plane is not there.

[Pyrpolizer]

I already explained you a long time ago that you should visit Inmarsats Web site and see for yourself what kind of services they provide. The neither provide nor receive any services to or from Boeing or Airbus. They only provide services to Rolls Royce. This service is a MINISCULE part of their activities.

Oh right. Rolls Royce! Is that all?

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/ ... IE20140314

http://www.rolls-royce.com/about/techno ... ystems.jsp

Rolls Royce are a part of the International Investigation Team in Malyasia because the B777 had Rolls Royce Engines. Boeing is also a part of the IIT, because the aircraft is American.

bye bye!

Unfortunately you do not even know what you're saying. Both Boeing and Rolls Royce are fully aware of the Inmarsat findings, as is the JACC and it just so happens they all concur and agree!

Rolls Royce are fitted on about 13000 large civil aircraft worldwide - Airbus and Boeing. ACARS reports back to the Airline which in turn is reported to both Boeing and Rolls Royce who keep track of all kinds of things in order for them to issue Air Directives to all operators. Part of what they do is monitor trends for all unserviceabilities and their duty of care is to recognize problem areas which they must inform all operators and issues recommendations that certain parts need to be overhauled or replaced. Similar to a recall if you like.

http://www.rolls-royce.com/civil/produc ... eaircraft/

Now do you really think that all the Engineers and Analysts at Boeing and Rolls Royce are fools and can be played by Inmarsat?

Providing services to ROLLS ROYCE does not mean it provides services to Boeing or Airbus.
Btw you are a waste of time as usual.
BYE BYE

[Paphitis]

There have been 4 other serious leads that they hastly chose to ignore.
a)Vietnam has detected transponder pings from a crashing aircraft the night it was lost
b}Vietnamese Admiral report as to the approximate crash location.
c)Oil drill worker report of witnessing an aircraft going down in flames
d)Those islanders who saw a a plane flying low over their place
e)The latest lead by that company placing the crash site at the gulf of Bengal.

None has been investigated thoroughly.
Why? Because at least one of them would lead to finding the plane and reveal the reasons why it crashed.

You think they are going to continue the search in the area they are currently focused because they are certain the plane is there.
I imply you they are simply wasting public money and they will waste more for their own pockets either in the form of salaries or huge commissions.
Just wait until they assign private contractors to continue this pointless so called search.

I IMPLY YOU THEIR PURPOSE IS NOT TO FIND THE PLANE BUT TO BURY ANY CHANCE OF FINDING IT ELSEWHERE WHERE IT REALLY IS.

Yes absolutely! They are going to continue searching in the current search area because they believe that is where MH370 is. The other leads are a matter for other countries to follow up and report back. They are not within Australia's jurisdiction!

The way things evolved proved that no Country is or was in any way excited to spend millions of public money for searching for someone elses plane within their jurisdiction. Vietnam was the first one to prove that.

The only one who was always ready to do that (for obvious reasons) was Australia.
Hence the whole Inmarsat story that surprise-surprise placed the crashed plane position within their jurisdiction.
You think the Australians believe the plane is in fact there.
I already told you that I am certain the Australians know the plane is not there.

China, USA and Malaysia have indicated they are all in it for the long haul and already they have spent far more searching for MH370 than any other air disaster.

Yes I do believe the Australians believe the aircraft is in the Indian Ocean just like some 26 other countries that were also involved in the search.

I know this country and I know their integrity and willingness to always lend a hand when it is needed. They have NEVER given me any reason to not trust the Australian Government, its Military, and its ethos!

they will always try and assist what is the greater good. Aviation is an integral part of the country and this crash has hit a raw nerve around the globe. 6 Australian Citizens were also on board the aircraft and that provides for slightly more motivation because there are families in Australia, and friends who really need closure.

[Paphitis]

I already explained you a long time ago that you should visit Inmarsats Web site and see for yourself what kind of services they provide. The neither provide nor receive any services to or from Boeing or Airbus. They only provide services to Rolls Royce. This service is a MINISCULE part of their activities.

Oh right. Rolls Royce! Is that all?

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/ ... IE20140314

http://www.rolls-royce.com/about/techno ... ystems.jsp

Rolls Royce are a part of the International Investigation Team in Malyasia because the B777 had Rolls Royce Engines. Boeing is also a part of the IIT, because the aircraft is American.

bye bye!

Unfortunately you do not even know what you're saying. Both Boeing and Rolls Royce are fully aware of the Inmarsat findings, as is the JACC and it just so happens they all concur and agree!

Rolls Royce are fitted on about 13000 large civil aircraft worldwide - Airbus and Boeing. ACARS reports back to the Airline which in turn is reported to both Boeing and Rolls Royce who keep track of all kinds of things in order for them to issue Air Directives to all operators. Part of what they do is monitor trends for all unserviceabilities and their duty of care is to recognize problem areas which they must inform all operators and issues recommendations that certain parts need to be overhauled or replaced. Similar to a recall if you like.

http://www.rolls-royce.com/civil/produc ... eaircraft/

Now do you really think that all the Engineers and Analysts at Boeing and Rolls Royce are fools and can be played by Inmarsat?

Providing services to ROLLS ROYCE does not mean it provides services to Boeing or Airbus.
Btw you are a waste of time as usual.
BYE BYE

Yes it does! Air Directives are issued by Boeing and the Rolls Royce Engine is fitted on Boeing Aircraft!

http://www.boeing.com/boeing/defense-sp ... sat-5.page

http://www.inmarsat.com/press-release/i ... th-boeing/

Bye Bye yourself!

[Paphitis]

I already explained you a long time ago that you should visit Inmarsats Web site and see for yourself what kind of services they provide. The neither provide nor receive any services to or from Boeing or Airbus. They only provide services to Rolls Royce. This service is a MINISCULE part of their activities.

Oh right. Rolls Royce! Is that all?

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/ ... IE20140314

http://www.rolls-royce.com/about/techno ... ystems.jsp

Rolls Royce are a part of the International Investigation Team in Malyasia because the B777 had Rolls Royce Engines. Boeing is also a part of the IIT, because the aircraft is American.

bye bye!

Unfortunately you do not even know what you're saying. Both Boeing and Rolls Royce are fully aware of the Inmarsat findings, as is the JACC and it just so happens they all concur and agree!

Rolls Royce are fitted on about 13000 large civil aircraft worldwide - Airbus and Boeing. ACARS reports back to the Airline which in turn is reported to both Boeing and Rolls Royce who keep track of all kinds of things in order for them to issue Air Directives to all operators. Part of what they do is monitor trends for all unserviceabilities and their duty of care is to recognize problem areas which they must inform all operators and issues recommendations that certain parts need to be overhauled or replaced. Similar to a recall if you like.

http://www.rolls-royce.com/civil/produc ... eaircraft/

Now do you really think that all the Engineers and Analysts at Boeing and Rolls Royce are fools and can be played by Inmarsat?

Providing services to ROLLS ROYCE does not mean it provides services to Boeing or Airbus.
Btw you are a waste of time as usual.
BYE BYE

BTW, have a read of this! It blows all your stupid theories right out of the water!

http://www.inmarsat.com/press-release/i ... g-service/

Now Bye bye and don't come back until you have something sensible to say!

Inmarsat has been a strong contributor and a valuable service to the Aviation Industry and the key objective of this, and that of Boeing and Airbus, is to make Aviation safety better, and this always precedes the need and desire to make money. You on the other hand are a cynical and twisted prat that is nothing more than a nuisance who has no clue about the industry itself. Without safety, Boeing and Airbus can not make any money, and Safety is the what Inmarsat can assist with with their SATCOM!

Who would you have preferred to fly with? Cyprus airways or Helios? Would you pay the extra 100Euro to Athens or are you one of those that places a few Euro ahead of safety? I bet you would have gone with helios!

You asked me about my family flying on aircraft. I have no issue with them flying on Boeing or Airbus and I have my Airline Preferences. It's not a problem and Malaysia Airlines is right up there. It's a blue ribbon airline, that has had a lot of misfortune from something so unpredictable and unprecedented. Helios on the other hand was not safe because it was run by Cypriot idiots that placed money ahead of safety. A good airline like Cyprus Airways would not do that, even if they do lose money. they can hopefully turn it around but they never would have any chance if they compromised their safety. Boeing, Airbus and Inmarsat work on the same principles but on a far greater scale.

They are not running Cypriot Electricity Stations for crying out loud and when they store explosives in the cargo hold, there are many procedures and safety controls in doing so, and that does not involve storing the explosives in 45 degree heat!

really sorry but you are too cynical for my liking. Really sad! You really do need to get a grip. There is a massive effort underway by GOOD individuals with their heart in the right place who are doing everything possible to find MH370. their motivations are AVIATION SAFETY and the relatives that have lost loved ones.

That is how I see it, and that is how the vast majority see it, and the search will continue despite your smart arse comments and it is very likely that their efforts will continue for a very long time. this search is not about to end any time soon and potentially it could go on for years.

[Pyrpolizer]

Don't worry dear. You still have hopes of getting something.
Matthew 5:3
Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

[Paphitis]

Don't worry dear. You still have hopes of getting something.
Matthew 5:3
Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

Your post just proves what a disrespectful and idiotic prat you are.

Worst case scenario is that they won't find anything but MH:70 would be within 450 nautical miles of the current search area in the depths of the Indian Ocean. You however are hoping they don't find out just to win your pathetic dummy spit argument against all reason, whilst good men and women are currently doing their best to find the wreckage in difficult circumstances.

I believe they will find MH370 and I certainly hope they do. The best experts are currently working on this as we speak. How dare you even f@&king come close to questioning them. You're just a demented and twisted old man.

You need to grow up princess!