Cyprus-Forum.com

by **Paphitis** » Thu May 01, 2014 2:45 am

repulsewarrior wrote:...and the Chinese, most of the passengers are their Nationals, what are the Chinese doing, i would expect to hear a lot more of their involement.

...if i understand correctly, Australia is doing the heavy work because it is in their territorial waters?

The Chinese are heavily involved RW. They are all over this like a rash.

In fact, they have made an enormous contribution to the search effort and are privy to all the information and data minus any of the secret squirrel stuff (sensitive military intelligence) if any exists.

by **repulsewarrior** » Thu May 01, 2014 2:54 am

thanks...

by **Paphitis** » Thu May 01, 2014 5:47 am

After the JACC was pressed about not responding to the Bay of Bengal "lead", Australia quickly responded that the area was not in their SAR Zone insinuating that Australia will not respond or investigate. Angus Houston said it falls under Malaysia's jurisdiction and that they should investigate the "lead".

Well Malaysia responded today by saying they are not going to respond or investigate the "lead". :lol:

They obviously know! And they obviously know that MH370 is not in the Bay of Bengal.

Malaysia will release the preliminary report on the disappearance of MH370. Looking forward to this and wonder what revelations this report will hold.

by **Paphitis** » Thu May 01, 2014 5:52 am

It was like the quick one two handball to Malaysia by Australia and then Malaysia responded by saying "I don't wanna play this stupid time wasting game". :lol:

Angus Houston is bloody clever. Have you ever wondered why this guy heads the JACC? There is so obviously something going on and judging by his confidence, Australia knows something for sure.

by **Pyrpolizer** » Thu May 01, 2014 11:25 am

Paphitis wrote:After the JACC was pressed about not responding to the Bay of Bengal "lead", Australia quickly responded that the area was not in their SAR Zone insinuating that Australia will not respond or investigate. Angus Houston said it falls under Malaysia's jurisdiction and that they should investigate the "lead".

Well Malaysia responded today by saying they are not going to respond or investigate the "lead".

They obviously know! And they obviously know that MH370 is not in the Bay of Bengal.

Malaysia will release the preliminary report on the disappearance of MH370. Looking forward to this and wonder what revelations this report will hold.

They already got themselves in such a mess, by been hasty and submitting that preliminary report, that at THIS STAGE it is better for them NOT TO FIND THE AIRCRAFT in the Indian Ocean rather than FIND IT ANYWHERE ELSE. By starting an Investigation ANYWHERE else, is like admitting their preliminary report is doubtful and worthless.

by **Pyrpolizer** » Thu May 01, 2014 11:55 am

Paphitis wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:
Paphitis wrote:And for the rest of you who can actually comprehend or finished high school, here is an official source from Honeywell who actually manufacture FDR and CVR Boxes.

Also confirmation that both have there own pinger - ULB!

http://aerospace.honeywell.com/blog/abo ... lack-boxes

Honeywell also supply Boeing with their Black Boxes. The FDR and CVR on MH370 were manufactured by Honeywell. Airbus also use Honeywell.

Actually you started that they recorded 2 separate sources of pings one of which presumably came from the black box emitter and another from the fuselage emitter.
cyprus41865-1010.html#p786526

Then you changed your story that those pings came from 2 separate black box emitters, one attached to the CVR and another to the FDR. After all sorts of irrelevant links you ended up to the link of Honeywell showing the 2 units in separate mode with 2 separate emitters.

Of course you forgot that at today's digital age Honeywell has abandoned that old technology and now produces these "Solid-State Voice/Data & Digital Communications" an all in one system i.e. that uses only one emitter.

http://www51.honeywell.com/aero/common/ ... ations.pdf

So which one of the two is your story, reh pello-methysmene?

It all stems to you being unable to comprehend. I never stated where the 2 alleged sources originated from. I just said that there were apparently 2 sources. You claim that this is not possible.

It is common knowledge that aircraft have 2 Black Boxes and I have explained this in other posts I made a few ago in the AF447 thread. As far as ULBs are concerned, there are 1 each for the FDR and CVR and another on the fuselage. FACT.

They use 2 ULBs only in case the FDR and the CVR are physically separated. Not in case they are all in one unit. FACT.
And what I actually said is that it is wrong to use 2 or more ULBs of the same specs, because you run the risk of not hearing any of them due to resonance. The investigation of AF447 never revealed any information or explanation as to why they never heard anything from their ULBs and I am certain the reason had to do with that specific mistake of using 2 or more ULBs of same frequency resulting to resonance and total mess up.

This apparent mistake will be corrected in the future by using more ULBs of different frequencies.
http://www.essayforum.com/writing-3/los ... ing-57063/

by **Paphitis** » Thu May 01, 2014 2:42 pm

Whether you like it or not, they are going all out to find MH370 and they have gone all out from day one.

The operations have been well organized and intensive and it appears that 3 countries are in it for the long haul - AUS, China, and Malaysia.

They don't just think it is in the Indian Ocean. They all believe it IS in the Indian Ocean.

No cost will be spared until it is found.

The US is only covering a few million. AUS and China will do the heavy lifting. Malaysia stated in will spare no money.

Just curious why you would believe that the FDR Recorder and CVR are separated. Fact is some units are even combined.
Another fact is that both are housed in the Tail Section near the APU which is the part of the aircraft most likely to survive.

by **Paphitis** » Thu May 01, 2014 3:02 pm

There are reports that the preliminary report has been released to the public. If that is the case, I can't seem to find it but it shouldn't be too long.

It should be an interesting read. I hope to give you guys a thorough analysis if it has any juicy technical stuff.

There has been a lot of activity in the Chinese Press as well. China and Australia are claiming that MH370 should be found this year. Something is going on for sure.

Private firms will soon be contracted to the JACC with specialist equipment which includes the most advance side scan sonars on the planet and multiple AUV and RAUV submersibles capable of going down to 6000m.

by **Pyrpolizer** » Thu May 01, 2014 7:26 pm

Here's the report:
http://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2014 ... documents/

Page 5 Cargo Manifest: It did carry a lot of Il-ion batteries.
It seems 1990+463 Kg :!:

So they were lying all along

by **Pyrpolizer** » Thu May 01, 2014 7:37 pm

Yep 2453 Kg!!
THE PACKAGE CONTAINS LITHIUM ION BATTERIES
THE PACKAGE MUST BE HANDLED WITH CARE
FLAMABILITY HAZARDS EXIST IF THE PACKAGE IS DAMAGED.
SPECIAL PROCEDURE MUST BE FOLLOWED IN THE EVENT THE PACKAGE IS DAMAGED TO INCLIUDE INSPECTION AND REPACKAGING IF NECESSARY.

lol. wEREN'T THEY ALWAYS SAYING IT ONLY CARRIED FRESH MANGOSTEEN?l

LIARS :oops: