Cyprus-Forum.com

[Paphitis]

...no,no,no, i mean the seabed floor, for example, scientifically, or in terms of exploration, does the information gathered, perhaps unintentionally since the search for the airplane is the priority, is it useful in another sense (or another enterprise)?

Australian PM said that every sq inch of the 56000sq km search area will be covered.

I suppose it would be useful RW.

The ocean floor is mostly unexplored. There is more known about the moon that at the depths of the world's oceans. Who knows what they can find down there. If anything they can learn a bit more about the sea bed in the Indian Ocean. I am sure many scientists would be very keen to get their hands on the data about the topography down there.

[GreekIslandGirl]

...no,no,no, i mean the seabed floor, for example, scientifically, or in terms of exploration, does the information gathered, perhaps unintentionally since the search for the airplane is the priority, is it useful in another sense (or another enterprise)?

Australian PM said that every sq inch of the 56000sq km search area will be covered.

Makes you think that they were just looking for an excuse, any excuse, to invade and destroy another bit of our planet ...

[Paphitis]

Here is a link to what was said by Angus Houston about the Bay of Bengal.

http://www.skynews.com.au/news/top-stor ... found.html

I really liked the point he made about the Bay of Bengal not being in Australia's SAR Zone.

Well, he is right! And he get's Australia of the hook from being accused of not taking it seriously.

He said "that the lead should be investigated" by someone else!

You got to love Aussie Intelligence.

[Pyrpolizer]

And for the rest of you who can actually comprehend or finished high school, here is an official source from Honeywell who actually manufacture FDR and CVR Boxes.

Also confirmation that both have there own pinger - ULB!

http://aerospace.honeywell.com/blog/abo ... lack-boxes

Honeywell also supply Boeing with their Black Boxes. The FDR and CVR on MH370 were manufactured by Honeywell. Airbus also use Honeywell.

Actually you started that they recorded 2 separate sources of pings one of which presumably came from the black box emitter and another from the fuselage emitter.
cyprus41865-1010.html#p786526

Then you changed your story that those pings came from 2 separate black box emitters, one attached to the CVR and another to the FDR. After all sorts of irrelevant links you ended up to the link of Honeywell showing the 2 units in separate mode with 2 separate emitters.

Of course you forgot that at today's digital age Honeywell has abandoned that old technology and now produces these "Solid-State Voice/Data & Digital Communications" an all in one system i.e. that uses only one emitter.

http://www51.honeywell.com/aero/common/ ... ations.pdf

So which one of the two is your story, reh pello-methysmene?

[Pyrpolizer]

...no,no,no, i mean the seabed floor, for example, scientifically, or in terms of exploration, does the information gathered, perhaps unintentionally since the search for the airplane is the priority, is it useful in another sense (or another enterprise)?

Australian PM said that every sq inch of the 56000sq km search area will be covered.

Of course it's going to be useful RW. Have you ever heard of a 60 million contract that is not useful for the pockets of those who use the tax payer's money? Half of it will be their commission.

[Pyrpolizer]

Here is a link to what was said by Angus Houston about the Bay of Bengal.

http://www.skynews.com.au/news/top-stor ... found.html

I really liked the point he made about the Bay of Bengal not being in Australia's SAR Zone.

Well, he is right! And he get's Australia of the hook from being accused of not taking it seriously.

He said "that the lead should be investigated" by someone else!

You got to love Aussie Intelligence.

GOOD!
Finally, some hope in the horizon.

[Paphitis]

And for the rest of you who can actually comprehend or finished high school, here is an official source from Honeywell who actually manufacture FDR and CVR Boxes.

Also confirmation that both have there own pinger - ULB!

http://aerospace.honeywell.com/blog/abo ... lack-boxes

Honeywell also supply Boeing with their Black Boxes. The FDR and CVR on MH370 were manufactured by Honeywell. Airbus also use Honeywell.

Actually you started that they recorded 2 separate sources of pings one of which presumably came from the black box emitter and another from the fuselage emitter.
cyprus41865-1010.html#p786526

Then you changed your story that those pings came from 2 separate black box emitters, one attached to the CVR and another to the FDR. After all sorts of irrelevant links you ended up to the link of Honeywell showing the 2 units in separate mode with 2 separate emitters.

Of course you forgot that at today's digital age Honeywell has abandoned that old technology and now produces these "Solid-State Voice/Data & Digital Communications" an all in one system i.e. that uses only one emitter.

http://www51.honeywell.com/aero/common/ ... ations.pdf

So which one of the two is your story, reh pello-methysmene?

It all stems to you being unable to comprehend. I never stated where the 2 alleged sources originated from. I just said that there were apparently 2 sources. You claim that this is not possible.

It is common knowledge that aircraft have 2 Black Boxes and I have explained this in other posts I made a few ago in the AF447 thread. As far as ULBs are concerned, there are 1 each for the FDR and CVR and another on the fuselage. FACT.

[Paphitis]

...no,no,no, i mean the seabed floor, for example, scientifically, or in terms of exploration, does the information gathered, perhaps unintentionally since the search for the airplane is the priority, is it useful in another sense (or another enterprise)?

Australian PM said that every sq inch of the 56000sq km search area will be covered.

Of course it's going to be useful RW. Have you ever heard of a 60 million contract that is not useful for the pockets of those who use the tax payer's money? Half of it will be their commission.

They have a SAR obligation! I am sure the Australian Government wouldn't want to spend the money but it is obliged to and the world is thankful that they do, particularly the relatives.

What they achieves helps make aviation safer.

[Paphitis]

Here is a link to what was said by Angus Houston about the Bay of Bengal.

http://www.skynews.com.au/news/top-stor ... found.html

I really liked the point he made about the Bay of Bengal not being in Australia's SAR Zone.

Well, he is right! And he get's Australia of the hook from being accused of not taking it seriously.

He said "that the lead should be investigated" by someone else!

You got to love Aussie Intelligence.

GOOD!
Finally, some hope in the horizon.

Basically they are saying that it should be investigated but they are not going to.

In other words they don't want to waste their time, money and resources and start chasing everything up people may come up with.

Pyro, the ADF is professional and Australia is probably one of the best countries to be involved in the MH370 search and it is clear to me that they have information and are working on that information. I still believe the Australian and American Intelligence Services are behind the scenes with some highly sensitive information from sensitive satellites and radar.

The Australian JORN Radar, is sophisticated. The Americans always test their new stealth aircraft against this technology.

[repulsewarrior]

...and the Chinese, most of the passengers are their Nationals, what are the Chinese doing, i would expect to hear a lot more of their involement.

...if i understand correctly, Australia is doing the heavy work because it is in their territorial waters?