Maximus wrote:I am not optimistic no, but for very different reasons than you.
Prey tell, because the public on this side does not take these talks very seriously or believes there will ever be a solution.
Maximus wrote:I am not optimistic no, but for very different reasons than you.
Viewpoint wrote:Maximus wrote:I am not optimistic no, but for very different reasons than you.
Prey tell, because the public on this side does not take these talks very seriously or believes there will ever be a solution.
Viewpoint wrote:Wİthout arbitration and deadlines our moronic leaders on both sides of the fence will go around in circles for the next zillion years. Imho there also has to be penalities if a solution is not reached.
Jerry wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Wİthout arbitration and deadlines our moronic leaders on both sides of the fence will go around in circles for the next zillion years. Imho there also has to be penalities if a solution is not reached.
VP if arbitration was applied to the Cyprus problem according to international law then it would be worse for you than the AP and the GCs would have most if not all of their claims/demands met. Arbitration means agreeing to be bound by the decision of the arbitrator, the UN has been a mediator in Cyprus. You confuse the word arbitration for compromise.
The ROC would, I'm sure, welcome arbitration provided it was based on the principles on which the UN, EU and other bodies were founded rather than Turkey's law of the jungle.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitration
Maximus wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Maximus wrote:I am not optimistic no, but for very different reasons than you.
Prey tell, because the public on this side does not take these talks very seriously or believes there will ever be a solution.
What do you want me to tell you? It is common knowledge to those that follow this that the "TRNC" drives at becoming an independent sovereign state.
Viewpoint wrote:Maximus wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Maximus wrote:I am not optimistic no, but for very different reasons than you.
Prey tell, because the public on this side does not take these talks very seriously or believes there will ever be a solution.
What do you want me to tell you? It is common knowledge to those that follow this that the "TRNC" drives at becoming an independent sovereign state.
Maxi you have to get things into perspective if it can be proven that unifying will be far more beneficial than getting the TRNC recognized what do you think people will vote?
Maximus wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Maximus wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Maximus wrote:I am not optimistic no, but for very different reasons than you.
Prey tell, because the public on this side does not take these talks very seriously or believes there will ever be a solution.
What do you want me to tell you? It is common knowledge to those that follow this that the "TRNC" drives at becoming an independent sovereign state.
Maxi you have to get things into perspective if it can be proven that unifying will be far more beneficial than getting the TRNC recognized what do you think people will vote?
I agree, the people in the north want a separate state because it serves their interests and only their interests but this does not serve the interests of Cypriots. Your perspective serves Turkey's interests, the interests of Turkish citizens that have been transferred there and the carpetbaggers.
Your alternative is apartheid through the status quo, which does not serve the interests of Cypriots either.
Maximus wrote:I agree with you!
From the perspective of the people (+ Turkey) north of the ceasefire line, the best deal is a separate recognized state. This IS what they want.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests