boulio wrote:Wonder why mr.h didn't mention Nagorno-Karabakh at all in is analysis?
Jerry wrote:Here you go Mr H:-
http://www.justice.gov.tr/e-journal/pdf/LW7081.pdf
The Community and its member States will not recognise entities which are the
result of aggression (page 8)
The doctrine of non-recognition, also known as the Stimson Doctrine of nonrecognition,
means to not grant recognition to the new entities or the some factual
positions which are the result of any illegal actions such as using force.54 It supported the principle that legal rights cannot obtain from an illegal situation. ( ex injuria jus non
oritur) (page 10)
Read, enjoy and then shove it where the sun does not shine. Look who wrote it and yet no mention of "trnc"
MrH wrote: ... if it hasn't Practically happened already!
Flying Horse wrote:Oh I dunno B25, Scotlands got a great big wall there for a reason. All be it derelict now and just there for tourists these days
I'm not sure the Scots will be an independent state any time soon though.
Unfortunately what Mr. H overlooks is that the 'trnc' has been illegally established on 80 per cent Greek Cypriot land which makes any form of recognition impossible. I thought that was pretty clear by now.
MrH wrote:And finally:
Demonax wrote:Unfortunately what Mr. H overlooks is that the 'trnc' has been illegally established on 80 per cent Greek Cypriot land which makes any form of recognition impossible. I thought that was pretty clear by now.
This above quote I had to comment on as it's literally the laugh of the century. In answer, I would ask Demonax to think about how far back do you want to go...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests