The subaltern wrote: Unfortunately you are like a broken record.
Do you have a mirror anywhere ? Do you really think YOU do not sound like a broken record, traipsing out the same old BS over and over and over ?
The subaltern wrote:These, as I mentioned before, are organizations conceived and organized in Europe, their philosophy based on European values, belief, politics, interests, attitudes towards others etc. They have very little understanding of those they are trying to reform. They do not even talk to them! They just try to impose their views through propaganda, dressed in pseudoscientific crap in order to give them an aura of respectability and authority. And when they are not very successful, they resort to character assassination and the like.
You post the above and accuse THEM of character assassination ? Once again the reality is that Birdlife Cyprus is an organisation predominately funded and run by CYPRIOTS. This is not rumour, or speculation or opinion it is just plain FACT. You can and will say till you are blue in the face that they 'conceived and organized in Europe' and 'have very little understanding of those they are trying to reform' because your propaganda requires it but doing so does not make your claims any more true.
The subaltern wrote:Now, if you were a student at a university and you said to your teacher: I am saying nothing more and nothing less on what someone else says, do you know what his response would have been? Do not rely on one source, go and do some more research and some more reading, be critical and then use your own judgment.
And if you were a student at university and said to your teacher I refuse to even consider data gained from meticulous scientific study and dismiss it out of hand because those that produced it are organizations conceived and organized in Europe, their philosophy based on European values, belief, politics, interests, attitudes towards others etc and my political beliefs and agenda require me to dismiss their data out of hand and to do all I can to character assassinate them, he would call you a twat and he would be right.
The subaltern wrote:These organizations are undemocratic and socially divisive. Look at Cyprus as an example; they are trying to impose their views, unfortunately with the connivance of the Cyprus government, on a people that have been practicing a tradition for thousands of years without any effect on the species and without even having the decency of conducting rudimentary dialog or consultation with the practitioners; instead they call them all the names under the sun! Would they do such a thing in their homelands? They will be sued for defamation and character assassination. (Do not answer me with your usual indiscriminate trapping and the like)
You just go on and on and on repeating the same old un truths and every time I point them out you just ignore this and start spouting them out again. Once more.
1. The way illegal trapping is done in Cyprus TODAY, with mist nets and recorded bird calls acting as lures has NO historical tradition going back 1000's of years. This is just FACT. Even then your argument is intellectually bankrupt in any case. Human kind has been burning hydro carbons ever since they first discovered fire. This is NOT a valid argument to say we should not worry about burning hydrocarbons TODAY.
2. To claim that Birdlife Cyprus have not had even rudimentary dialog or consultation with practitioners of hunting, legal and illegal is just not true. It is in fact a lie.
3. Birdlife Cyprus calls those who engage in illegal activity criminals, because that is what the word criminal MEANS. They highlight that in some areas illegal trapping activity is controlled by established criminal gangs that control all illegal activity in those areas because that is TRUE. You by comparison call those who fund and work for Birdlife Cypriots any number of names and your comrade in arms even goes on to suggest that 'perhaps' those CYPRIOTS who bank roll Birdlife Cyprus do so as some kind of tax dodge.
4. As for "Would they do such a thing in their homelands?" - they ARE in their own homeland ! How many times will you claim that Birdlife Cyprus is a 'foreign' entity against all actual reality ?
The subaltern wrote:In those countries, there are strong vested interests that will employ experts to compile studies to prove that their intrusion in whatever area will have negative economic, social, political and other consequences. They stop them in their tracks or minimize their actions to such an extent that they become impotent. The supporters of these NGOs if they insist in interfering, the police are sent in to have them arrested. In Cyprus the opposite happens; the NGOs behave like the police!
Your ignorance is astounding. Firstly no one is stopping the illegal trappers from employing experts to produce reports that the benefits of their activities produce more social good than harm. Why do they NOT do this ? Because they know they have not a snow ball in hells chance of making such an argument. The legislation that makes trapping with sticks and mist nets illegal in Cyprus is EU driven legislation and applies across all EU nations. Yes a couple of nations on their entry did negotiate temporary derogations for certain activities but these are just that - temporary and Cyprus had that opportunity but decline to use it as it was at the time frying bigger political fish with its accession to the EU. Equivalent national organisations to Birdlife Cyprus exist in all EU member states and unlike in Cyprus in some of them they actually do have legal powers of entry and arrest in their own rights (the RSPCA in the UK for example). In Cyprus Birdlife Cyprus do not act like the police and the accusation is just untrue. They work WITH both the game fund and the police in the RoC and the SBA such that if and when they spot illegal activity they inform the relevant body to deal with it. They do not enter private property because to do so is illegal. They do not even remove or destroy those lime sticks or mist nets they find in their surveys. They call the game fund and THEY come and remove such because they have the legal right to do so.
The subaltern wrote:Look what is happening to the birds as a result of the farming practices, among others, in Europe. That’s where the root of the problem lays and not here in Cyprus. You said something, regarding this; oh it’s a complicated problem. No it’s not. There is organized opposition there. That’s what makes it complicated. You have to negotiate with the vested interests if you can, unlike what is happening with your actions in Cyprus.
Issues like intensive farming, habitat destruction for urban development these are all activities that produce arguable social benefit that is offset against the harm they do. This is NOT true of illegal trapping which is exactly WHY interests vested in illegal trapping can not 'negotiate' a decriminalisation of their activites. I have made this point over and over and you just continue to ignore it and just start all over again.
The subaltern wrote:You do not want me to continue do you?
No but you will anyway.
The subaltern wrote:And do not come up with your one line cut and paste responses!
You claim I say X. When I cut an paste what I have actually said previous that shows I actually said the opposite to X, you then come back with 'do not come back with your cut and paste' as if you have some right to tell me what I can and can not do. Stop trying to make out things about me and what I have said that are not true (like I single out only the RoC) and I will have no need to 'cut and paste' to prove what you claim about me and what I have said is not true.
The subaltern wrote:I am doing it because I noticed that that you hold this idea, central to your perception of things, that these organizations are infallible and holier than thou, therefore whatever they say must be true and you base all your arguments upon this assumption.
I do not say these organisations are infallible and holier than thou and therefore what they say must be true. I say they are more credible than you because they know what they are talking about and their reports are based on real hard data, meticulous accumulated. I know this to be true because I have been on these surveys, been shown how they are designed and how they are operated. Just as a I know your claims are NOT true (Birdlife Cyprus is a 'foreign' organisation, they falsify their data, they never talk to or consult with hunters and trappers, they have a political agenda, separate from and outside of their environmental one and on and on and on). Given what I know of them and what I know of you combined with what I see for myself with my own eyes and I make a critical evaluation as to who I think is the most credible, and the answer is not you.
The subaltern wrote:Grudgingly you have conceded that there is a problem in the occupied part of Cyprus and that some reports have been compiled however incomplete.....
No not grudgingly - I have made that clear through out my participation in this discussion. I can PROVE this by copying and pasting the multiple times I have explicitly stated this previously, oh but I have been 'forbidden' by you from doing so. That you characterise the fact that through out the entire discussion I have repeatedly made it clear this is an island wide problem and not one isolated to the south as 'grudgingly conceding' just show how manipulative your are of actual truth to serve your agenda.
The subaltern wrote: Now, if I may ask you: in what language are the reports written? Can I get hold of them on the internet? (I have done the leg work but without success) Who compiled them? Have you had a hand in compiling them? And if they have been published on the internet could you be so kind as to give me the address?
Well as if evidence was need that you do not even read my posts before regurgitating your same old BS over and over, then this is it. I have ALREADY posted a link to one. Shall I 'copy and paste' it again ? Or would expecting you to go and find it yourself and actually READ my post where it is be too unreasonable an expectation of you from me ? As an old university lecturer friend of my might say 'twat!'