The subaltern wrote: stop believing in your own propaganda .....
It is not MY propaganda, these are numbers produced by credible organisations, the leading one of which is to all intents and purposes a Cypriot one, based on long term rigorous surveys. But you would have me not believe their figures but instead believe yours, an anonymous poster on a obscure forum based on as far as I can tell nothing at all ? Is this is what you are suggesting to me is a 'rational' course of action ?
The subaltern wrote:The price of the birds you have been advertising (Latest price per dozen 80 Euros!!! Who can afford the staff) Read my posts.
I have never advertised a price of a bird.
The subaltern wrote: The species caught: Two reports written by the keepers of the truth vary widely!! Read my previous posts
No they do not.
The subaltern wrote: A large number of birds listed in statistics by the keepers of the truth are either too few to be hunted, too large to be caught by the lime sticks or not eaten by the Cypriots. The few that are hunted are not at risk. In fact are on the increase in Europe. Read my previous posts and the reports by BirdLife international.
The reason why both limestick and mist nets are banned as a means of hunting is that they are INDISCRIMINATE forms of hunting. You can not set a limestick or a mist net that will ONLY catch un endangered species. You keep claiming that you can but the claim is just bollocks.
The subaltern wrote:About the causes of bird depletion read my previous post as well as those of RSPB, BirdLife etc. All are pointing towards the same direction and that’s not towards Cyprus. Read my previous posts.
The claim that the damage done by illegal trapping in Cyprus (and elsewhere) to endangered species is so small it is statistically irrelevant to their on going survival is just bollocks. No one in this field of expertise believes this is true.
The subaltern wrote: How many people are involved in bird trapping?
I do not know. How many people are involved in the sale of illicit drugs in the RoC ? Or prostitution ? Or any other illegal activity ? Are you REALLY going to claim that unless I can give an accurate credible absolute number there can be no such activity ?
The subaltern wrote: How many restaurants serve ambeloboulia? (I know of none)
How many people you know sell drugs ? Have you sought them out ? Have you asked around ? Or is it you just do not personally know anyone who has tried to sell you drugs un invited by you , so therefore you claim there can not be any drug dealers ? If you want to find restaurants where you can purchase ambeloboulia it is not hard just as it is not that hard to find illicit drugs for sale.
The subaltern wrote: How many people eat ambelopoulia? (I know of none)
The detailed and rigorous bi annual surveys conducted by Birdlife Cyprus every year for over 10 years now do not seek to measure how many people are eating ambelopoulia, they seek to measure how much illegal trapping activity there is year and how that is varying from year to year. Is you argument really 'I do not personally know anyone who eats them (other than the Government minister who openly stated on TV they did perhaps) so therefore all the data meticulously produced by Birdlife Cyprus must be meaningless ?
and I tire of this now. It has all been said before.
At the end of the day we have serious professional experts who have been conducting rigorous bi annual surveys for over a decade and we have you. I know which to me is the more credible on this subject. You try and make out that the evidence is produced by some 'clique' who makes their living out of presenting false and exaggerated figures for their own benefit , yet you ignore that Birdlife Cyprus is bankrolled by foundations set up by a prominent Cypriot business family. So what is their 'angle' ? Why would they set up foundations to over exaggerate and distort the truth of this issue ? What possible motive is there for that ? A much simpler explanation is that the people who fund Birdlife Cyprus and who work for it do so because they care about this issue and they seek to produce the best statistical information about the extent of illegal trapping and you actually, just like GiG have no actual interest other than to try and downplay the real extent and effects of the problem, despite any and all evidence to the contrary.