Viewpoint wrote:B25 wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Totally agree, seeing they rejected the only plan put to a referendum they should put forward exactly what they think a solution should be for the whole world to see.
Here you go again, that statement should be corrected to say exactly how it was, thus;
" seeing they rejected the only unfair, unjust, illegal and totally Turkey orientated plan put to a referendum "That would have been a correct statement to make. Don't you agree??
A plan prepared by the UN and backed by many of the big players its very unlikely they will look at it through your glasses, you rejected the only plan put to referendum and like it or not thats a minus in the eyes of the international community. So the ball to put forward a plan is firmly in the GCs court and was expected after the referendum but as usual the GCs show they are full of hot air and no real substance or they would have placed a new revised plan on the table taking into account the demand of both sides.
The usual crock of shit from you VP, only to be expected. A plan by the UN you say, huh! Yeah. ok, lets us see which one version 1, 2, 3 ,,,,,,,, or the one Turkey wanted. OK, now we understand.