today i participated in a game done by a student. he created a phantastic scenario presenting a typical intercultural problem. for him it was perhaps a science fiction..
there were the bramen (75%) and the samnesen (16%). the bramen used to have their own king and (ofcource) were oppressing the minority. then a colonial power captured Boronia. the samnesen (ofcource) joined and helped the conquerors and enjoyed privilages (more educated more gov. jobs). after decolonisation the bramen decided to get their blood back (ofource). they started oppresing the samnesen even to the point they did not allow them to use their language. as a concequence (ofcource) the samnesen started fighting for their independance and there was a civil war lasting for 20 years.
the story was (ofcource) much longer (4 pages long with all kinds of spicy details). the participants were then devided randomly to represent 4 groups (the bramen, the samnesen, the UN and an NGO...i was a samnesian:) ). the purpose was to reach an agreement on the topic education.
my god. u should have seen them how fast the whole thing turned into a fight. people that were never minority or majority, that they didnt loose relatives or their hauses , that were just playing a game, soon became as aggresive as we are!!! ofcource they got out of topic, and everything came up to democracy , and who oppressed who and who started first. it was amazing but in a way their arguments were the same one as we use!!!
when i was looking at the representative of the bramens (who was quite aggresive by the way) i was thinking...my god is that the way we sound (the gc i mean)? our guy (the samnesian i mean ) gave ofcource the necesary replies and the UN was just standing in the middle having no idea what to do
up to now i thought we are just stupid thats why we cant find a solution. now i believe that we are just humans. in a way its forgivable.
it is important that our group wins.
stupid games, but one can learn a couple of things.