sven wrote:bill cobbett wrote:sven wrote:Get Real! wrote:Oh that... I see 5 scratches.
Thats what I saw, not cuts.
What a loada rubbish, clutching at straws amateur sleuthing, from the defenders of "golden dawn".
Whatever you think you see or don't see, whether they are cuts or scratches, taken together with the marks on her face and with her testimony, this girl was the victim of an assault by two thugs of "golden dawn".
Is that the best you can come up with, amateur sleuthing, whilst you believe the 'PROVEN PROPAGANDA', now your not bothered what the marks are, bill, they ARE superficial and an assault by two 'THUGS' would have caused more than scratches, it is YOU that is hanging onto 'STRAWS' . you have gone from an attack to cuts to scratches. Please look up cognitive dissonance.
The girl was assaulted by two "golden dawn" thugs.
Now go and look up the very simple English phrase LIVING IN DENIAL.