Flying Horse wrote:, because I aren't a politician!Not sure how
I don't disagree that both sides should be considered equal as an island of people indigenous to it. Please make yourself aware of that. Regardless of my GC family.
Now this is where the personal view of it comes in...... there is land in the North that belongs to my family, and only my family have the right to it(Not even sure we want it back tbh). We are so few in number in surname, we stand alone in the UK, and probably Cyprus too! This is why I can't quite agree to a two sided island with their own governing bodies etc(as I am slightly biased. BUT..... I have to take that personal view out of the equation and look at a far bigger picture. This is where the 'not quite sure how' part comes in.
Its not me that's messing with lives, its the powers that be which do. I'm not a politician.
I can't shout down what you say VP, as I am neither equipped with enough knowledge, nor am I so ignorant. I am also totally for sharing, but I think by now you will have noticed that
So far though, neither viewpoint is the better choice for all, which is why it goes around in circles.
But one viewpoint wants to force us TCs to live in a state under an administration we do not want how can you say that is equal to the one where people are given the option to live in the state of their choice.
Im sorry you have lost the right to property in the north but this is a two way street my family also has lost land in the south but in my solution you should be offered return where physically possible or compensation to buy where ever you wish but the alternative is forcing people to keep property under an administration they do not want to live under, can you understand the difference?