Flying Horse wrote:I can't recall ever seeing a Buddhist blowing people up in the name of their God.
Correct me if I'm wrong btw.
They seem to prefer self-immolations.
Flying Horse wrote:I can't recall ever seeing a Buddhist blowing people up in the name of their God.
Correct me if I'm wrong btw.
Get Real! wrote:Paphitis wrote:Get Real! wrote:Paphitis wrote:Btw, I am waiting for you to answer the question I posed to you!
Would you as commander of a 1000 sons of Cyprus send them to their deaths or order air support and ground strikes which may involve civilian casualties?
Cmon man, after your regular war threads I want to see what YOU would do!
I can’t answer this daft and vague scenario you’ve created in your non-military head.
And not to mention that it has nothing to do with the Geneva Conventions since civilians or injured/captured soldiers are not involved!
Just remember that unlike civilians, soldiers are legally expendable so they should be put to good use in an appropriate strategy.
Well Mr. Get Real,
You have just shown us exactly why you do not hold a Commission with the CNG!
You and I are completely different! You say your boys are expendable! My boys never were and never will be! My boys were family, mates and I would never live with myself if I didn't do everything in my power to keep them alive to return to their wives, children and extended families.
You just lack common sense and leadership.
You’re just pissed off because you can’t score a win via your shitty little scenario!
But who can possibly answer your question when they have no knowledge of the battle layout, available resources and overall options?
Get Real! wrote:Paphitis wrote:It was a military decision to avoid a costly full scale invasion resulting in the death of 1,000,000 plus allied troops, Jap troops and civilians over many months, and quite possibly many years.
They chose to deliver the knock out punch more efficiently and more humanely than the former option.
You, having served in the military should understand these concepts of leadership and the greater good and be able to make dificult decisions.
After 6 years of fighting the Japs, Australia and America had enough and were looking for a speedy end.
That’s the beauty of the Geneva Conventions Paphitis! You can no longer go for the easy way out of mass murdering civilians who are irrelevant to a fight and you MUST confront the enemy or surrender your self!
Which means that the tenacity of the Japanese military in WWII might have won them the war had it been fought fair and square!
Paphitis wrote:Get Real! wrote:Paphitis wrote:Btw, I am waiting for you to answer the question I posed to you!
Would you as commander of a 1000 sons of Cyprus send them to their deaths or order air support and ground strikes which may involve civilian casualties?
Cmon man, after your regular war threads I want to see what YOU would do!
I can’t answer this daft and vague scenario you’ve created in your non-military head.
And not to mention that it has nothing to do with the Geneva Conventions since civilians or injured/captured soldiers are not involved!
Just remember that unlike civilians, soldiers are legally expendable so they should be put to good use in an appropriate strategy.
Well Mr. Get Real,
You have just shown us exactly why you do not hold a Commission with the CNG!
You and I are completely different! You say your boys are expendable! My boys never were and never will be! My boys were family, mates and I would never live with myself if I didn't do everything in my power to keep them alive to return to their wives, children and extended families.
You just lack common sense and leadership.
Get Real! wrote:Paphitis, you're starting to go funny again and I'm getting bored so I'll leave you with this final message on this matter:
Read the bloody Geneva Conventions and quit pussyfooting about!
supporttheunderdog wrote:Paphitis wrote:Get Real! wrote:Paphitis wrote:Btw, I am waiting for you to answer the question I posed to you!
Would you as commander of a 1000 sons of Cyprus send them to their deaths or order air support and ground strikes which may involve civilian casualties?
Cmon man, after your regular war threads I want to see what YOU would do!
I can’t answer this daft and vague scenario you’ve created in your non-military head.
And not to mention that it has nothing to do with the Geneva Conventions since civilians or injured/captured soldiers are not involved!
Just remember that unlike civilians, soldiers are legally expendable so they should be put to good use in an appropriate strategy.
Well Mr. Get Real,
You have just shown us exactly why you do not hold a Commission with the CNG!
You and I are completely different! You say your boys are expendable! My boys never were and never will be! My boys were family, mates and I would never live with myself if I didn't do everything in my power to keep them alive to return to their wives, children and extended families.
You just lack common sense and leadership.
I nominate GR to join Kurupetos as a Cypriot loon.
supporttheunderdog wrote:I nominate GR to join Kurupetos as a Cypriot loon.
Paphitis wrote:when my son serves the CNG, you better not go near him you hear. Otherwise I am going to shove your G20 up your arse!
Get Real! wrote:supporttheunderdog wrote:I nominate GR to join Kurupetos as a Cypriot loon.
No amount of arguments with Oracle can ever prepare you for confronting the man with the facts and figures. At best you can beat me hands down in tabloid news!Paphitis wrote:when my son serves the CNG, you better not go near him you hear. Otherwise I am going to shove your G20 up your arse!
I doubt I can accommodate the G-20 major economies where you suggest…
Return to Politics and Elections
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest