u didnot tell me how we get to achieve that. i dont disagree with the "should", but thats a normative statement, and doesnot unfortunately ask my question.
I assume you are referring to the refugees. Well, they can return home by:
1) We agree to go back to the 1960 Treaty. This would mean the TRNC dissolved, GCs could go back home if they wish. Those who choose to, the TC living there must be re-housed. Either with a home in the south if their home was destroyed, or simply re-housed elsewhere in Cyprus, even if this means new building work having to commence, which could be funded by Greece, RoC and Turkey. Further, those settlers who have not ties to Cyprus would leave, which may greatly reduce the problem of GCs going back home in itself.
Some may prefer compensation than returning to their home. Therefore, it may be that the majority who do wish to return, can do so.
I prefer this because under this solution, I believe all who want to go home could potentially do so.
the reason i have accepted the tcs veto, is bc i believe that it is the ONLY way to achieve a solution accepted by both sides
I do not think a veto is necessary any longer. I think it will only enhance the divide between the two sides and may prove unworkable if the TCs abuse it, which I suspect they will - especially if some still have permanent partition in their hearts. However, if we go back to the 1960 Agreements, then I suppose I and many others would have to accept it. But TCs demanding more concessions and giving nothing in return is not viable.
power sharing, is not the drakula. it can work. we can make it work, if we want to avoid partition.
I agree, it isn't and it probably can work, BUT ONLY if it based on proportionality and justice. It will not work if the TC side get more than they should because they are reaping the benefits from the spoils of winning a war.