GreekIslandGirl wrote:My my, what a lot of unjustified attacks. You do seem particularly dense, towards understanding Germanic-English, today!
Maybe you are a Celtic remnant?
"Inherited trait" ? Race and language? Aren't
you the one who sourced a link on mitochondrial and Y chromosome detection of language evolution on your "How old is English" thread ?
(Perhaps you are just warming-up your personal-attack skills for de-railing Kimon's pending thread .... )
The alleged inherited trait you mentioned was fascism, as though it was a part of Germanic genetic make up to be born naturally fascist. That of course is racist nonsense and along with your absurdities about the heritability of dinosaur characteristics and craft skills, (as opposed to the inherited capability to learn craft skills) it shows your knowledge of inherited characteristics is woefully poor. The trouble is it appears to me that you are so consumed with your bitterness and animosity to the English in general and me in particular that you cannot see what an increasingly absurd characture you are making of your self.
The point of the articles is that on analysis of the possible ancestor languages of English (and the distribution of The Y chromosomes) there is less concordance between the language or the Genetics of the Angles, Saxons and Jutes with that of the English but a rather greater concordance between the English with that of Belgic/Frisian peoples. Now it is known the Belgea came to England before Romans and bearing in mind the linguistic similarities that suggest the language we now speak as English was probably brought by the Belgea peoples probably 500 years before the alleged Anglo Saxon invasion.
That is possibly confirmed by eg place name evidence where Names claimed to be Anglo Saxon in origin, ie post Roman departure, only make sense if describing likely pre Roman geographical features that ceased to exist before Roman times and the so called Anglo Saxons would not have known of. The logic of that is that these alleged Germanic names were applied in pre-Roman times.
There is likewise evidence of continuity of rituals from pre Roman times through to late medieval times , which likewise suggests a continuity that is contrary to the population replacement theories.
It is indeed quite likely that what are claimed by some to be Anglo Saxon genetic markers might be Viking markers.
Londinium itself may well have a Germanic rather than So called Celtic or Brythonic origin.
Note I am not claiming that no Angles Saxons and Jutes came to England after the end of Roman rule, some did, but increasingly the evidence tends suggests they were relatively few but ended up in position of power.