In an expert’s report by Dr. Klaus Stanjek of the Konrad Wolf Academy of Film and Television in Potsdam, Germany into footage of the killing of Ethem Sarısülük, who died 14 days after being shot on 1 June during the Gezi protests (pictured below), commissioned by the deceased’s family and their lawyers, the moment Sarısülük was shot is described as follows:
”It has been established that the policeman ran towards the demonstrators lying on the ground and took out his gun, the protestors threw stones wide of the mark, the policeman kicked the person on the ground, then released the gun’s safety catch, fired twice into the air, on the third shot brought the barrel of the gun parallel to the ground and with this shot hit Ethem Sarısülük ‘s head and, when he attempted to flee after the third shot, only one stone hit the policeman’s helmet.”
In the report, it having been stated: “When thought is given as to why the policeman ran up to the demonstrator writhing on the ground, kicked him in the head and at the same time, on his own, ran towards a large group of demonstrators who were ready for a skirmish and, in doing so, clearly and needlessly endangered himself, it is not a situation that can easily be understood,” it has been established that there can be no question of a self-defence situation. Stressing that the demonstrators were not the cause of these successive acts by the policeman, it is said, “On the contrary, this situation must be interpreted to a large extent as the policeman acting of his own accord.”
http://birgun.net/haber/mesru-mudafaa-y ... -4360.html