by yialousa1971 » Mon Jun 24, 2013 10:23 am
Paphitis wrote:Well that settles it then. It looks like the 'Greeks' are a bunch of invading Colonialists who invaded Cyprus many centuries ago!
Time for an EOKA C methinks where the indigenous rise against the colonial imperialists again!
ZoC can be in charge of the Political Wing or CNP!
by GreekIslandGirl » Mon Jun 24, 2013 10:55 am
Paphitis wrote:I have researched this, and I will publish results that show an Aboriginal Australian to have just as much genetic similarity with Greeks as Cypriots do with Greeks. Prepare to be shocked!
Yes, Australian Aboriginals are humans too and genetically we are ALL similar. 
by Paphitis » Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:01 am
GreekIslandGirl wrote:Paphitis wrote:I have researched this, and I will publish results that show an Aboriginal Australian to have just as much genetic similarity with Greeks as Cypriots do with Greeks. Prepare to be shocked!
Well, that must come as a great shock to you racist Ozzies.
... we're talking about migratory markers here so don't make an ass of yourself like stud who doesn't know one end of his DNA from the other ...
by Sotos » Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:46 am
supporttheunderdog wrote:Sotos wrote:But The people who lived in this area, in the case of what is now England until about 500AD had nothing English about them at all. It's not clear what language some spoke, but what we do know is that eg the Britons before the English invasions did not speak English nor for that matter worship the English gods. That only occurred later.
What you are oing is denying the separate and distinct identity of these particular ancient people. You complained about Hitler attacking Britain but that is just what happened with the invasion of the English, ie the Anglos and the Saxons that took place in that time frame, from say 500AD in what is now England.
They brought in eg the Germanic language that became English, their Gods and their culture... in 500AD
the usual bullshit diversionary tactics relying on outdated Historical arguments and off-topic absuditiestThere is an increasingly well respected body of thought which argues that in South and Eastenr Britain a Germanic language was being spoken since well before the Roman Invasion and the Saxon invasion is overstated. I am not denying there was no movement across the North Sea in the post Roman World but it was a part of a process that had been underway for many hundreds of years. That is however a topic for another thread.
by Paphitis » Mon Jun 24, 2013 1:27 pm
Sotos wrote:supporttheunderdog wrote:Sotos wrote:But The people who lived in this area, in the case of what is now England until about 500AD had nothing English about them at all. It's not clear what language some spoke, but what we do know is that eg the Britons before the English invasions did not speak English nor for that matter worship the English gods. That only occurred later.
What you are oing is denying the separate and distinct identity of these particular ancient people. You complained about Hitler attacking Britain but that is just what happened with the invasion of the English, ie the Anglos and the Saxons that took place in that time frame, from say 500AD in what is now England.
They brought in eg the Germanic language that became English, their Gods and their culture... in 500AD
the usual bullshit diversionary tactics relying on outdated Historical arguments and off-topic absuditiestThere is an increasingly well respected body of thought which argues that in South and Eastenr Britain a Germanic language was being spoken since well before the Roman Invasion and the Saxon invasion is overstated. I am not denying there was no movement across the North Sea in the post Roman World but it was a part of a process that had been underway for many hundreds of years. That is however a topic for another thread.
Why are you getting upset dog? You and your foreign buddies use your diversionary tactics all the time to turn every topic into one offending the main ethnicity of the native Cypriot people. Why don't you treat Greeks in Cyprus the same way as you treat the English in Britain? What exactly is different other than the fact that we came to Cyprus much earlier than the English went to Britain? Absurdity is for an English to say that he is native of Britain, for some white second generation immigrant to call himself native Australian!!!! ... and at the same time to question that Greeks are native to Cyprus! Are you guys so stupid you don't even realize the bullshit you are writing??
by Sotos » Mon Jun 24, 2013 5:29 pm
Paphitis wrote:Sotos wrote:supporttheunderdog wrote:Sotos wrote:But The people who lived in this area, in the case of what is now England until about 500AD had nothing English about them at all. It's not clear what language some spoke, but what we do know is that eg the Britons before the English invasions did not speak English nor for that matter worship the English gods. That only occurred later.
What you are oing is denying the separate and distinct identity of these particular ancient people. You complained about Hitler attacking Britain but that is just what happened with the invasion of the English, ie the Anglos and the Saxons that took place in that time frame, from say 500AD in what is now England.
They brought in eg the Germanic language that became English, their Gods and their culture... in 500AD
the usual bullshit diversionary tactics relying on outdated Historical arguments and off-topic absuditiestThere is an increasingly well respected body of thought which argues that in South and Eastenr Britain a Germanic language was being spoken since well before the Roman Invasion and the Saxon invasion is overstated. I am not denying there was no movement across the North Sea in the post Roman World but it was a part of a process that had been underway for many hundreds of years. That is however a topic for another thread.
Why are you getting upset dog? You and your foreign buddies use your diversionary tactics all the time to turn every topic into one offending the main ethnicity of the native Cypriot people. Why don't you treat Greeks in Cyprus the same way as you treat the English in Britain? What exactly is different other than the fact that we came to Cyprus much earlier than the English went to Britain? Absurdity is for an English to say that he is native of Britain, for some white second generation immigrant to call himself native Australian!!!! ... and at the same time to question that Greeks are native to Cyprus! Are you guys so stupid you don't even realize the bullshit you are writing??
What main ethnicity?
The main ethnicity is Cypriot. Greek never even existed before 1827!
It's just a modern construct that is much younger than the Australian and American ethnicity even.
Australia:
Ethnic groups:
white 92%, Asian 7%, aboriginal and other 1%
Cyprus:
Ethnic groups:
Greek 77%, Turkish 18%, other 5% (2001)
by Get Real! » Mon Jun 24, 2013 7:08 pm
What main ethnicity?
The main ethnicity is Cypriot. Greek never even existed before 1827!
by GreekIslandGirl » Mon Jun 24, 2013 8:08 pm
Get Real! wrote:What main ethnicity?
The main ethnicity is Cypriot. Greek never even existed before 1827!
Exactly!
The great European cartographers of the renaissance don’t even recognize anything Greek.
Brain dead Sotiroula can fantasize Turkishness all she wants…
Your mantra of "nothing Greek exists"!by kurupetos » Mon Jun 24, 2013 10:24 pm
yialousa1971 wrote:Paphitis wrote:Well that settles it then. It looks like the 'Greeks' are a bunch of invading Colonialists who invaded Cyprus many centuries ago!
Time for an EOKA C methinks where the indigenous rise against the colonial imperialists again!
ZoC can be in charge of the Political Wing or CNP!
He's too fat to lead and you're too small to fight.
by kurupetos » Mon Jun 24, 2013 10:26 pm
kurupetos wrote:Who taught Greek to the Cypriots? The Ottoman Turks or the Brits?
)? 
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
