by bill cobbett » Thu May 16, 2013 11:56 pm
yialousa1971 wrote:Cap wrote:kurupetos wrote:Cap wrote::lol:
Dunno mate.I am around 6ft, 14 stones, able to run 5km in around 25min. I do that three/four times a week.
I haven't been to a gym for some years though. I hope this helps.
OK, fair enough mate.
What about Yialousa?
Lets put this theory to the test.
So far 1 outta 2.
I'm not a skinny runt like GR or a short arse like Billy or Paphitis.
by yialousa1971 » Fri May 17, 2013 12:34 am
by bill cobbett » Fri May 17, 2013 1:29 am
yialousa1971 wrote:I'm not a Chicken like GR so I don't need to run.
by Get Real! » Fri May 17, 2013 1:38 am
by kurupetos » Fri May 17, 2013 3:23 pm
yialousa1971 wrote:Cap wrote:kurupetos wrote:Cap wrote::lol:
Dunno mate.
I haven't been to a gym for some years though. I hope this helps.
OK, fair enough mate.
What about Yialousa?
Lets put this theory to the test.
So far 1 outta 2.
I'm not a skinny runt like GR or a short arse like Billy or Paphitis.
by kurupetos » Fri May 17, 2013 3:28 pm
bill cobbett wrote:yialousa1971 wrote:I'm not a Chicken like GR so I don't need to run.
... so you're too overweight to run...???
by supporttheunderdog » Fri May 17, 2013 6:35 pm
Cap wrote::lol:Men who are physically strong are more likely to have right wing political views
Men who are physically strong are more likely to take a right wing political stance, while weaker men are inclined to support the welfare state, according to a new study.
Researchers discovered political motivations may have evolutionary links to physical strength.
Men's upper-body strength predicts their political opinions on economic redistribution, according to the research.
Men who are physically strong - like Arnold Schwarzenegger - are more likely to take a right wing political stance
The principal investigators - psychological scientists Michael Bang Petersen, of Aarhus University in Denmark, and Daniel Sznycer, of the University of California in the U.S., believe that the link may reflect psychological traits that evolved in response to our early ancestral environments and continue to influence behaviour today.
Professor Petersen said: ‘While many think of politics as a modern phenomenon, it has - in a sense - always been with our species.’
In the days of our early ancestors, decisions about the distribution of resources were not made in courthouses or legislative offices, but through shows of strength.
More...
Fish oil 'can restore the brain after junk food': Diets rich in omega-3s play key role in reversing damage caused by high fats
Scientists discover a link between epilepsy and autism for the first time
With this in mind, Professor Petersen and Professor Sznycer hypothesised that upper-body strength - a proxy for the ability to physically defend or acquire resources - would predict men's opinions about the redistribution of wealth.
The researchers collected data on bicep size, socio-economic status, and support for economic redistribution from hundreds of people in the United States, Argentina and Denmark.
In line with their hypotheses, the data revealed that wealthy men with high upper-body strength were less likely to support redistribution, while less wealthy men of the same strength were more likely to support it.
Men with less upper body strength are more likely to support the welfare state - like Labour leader Ed Miliband
Professor Petersen said: ‘Despite the fact that the United States, Denmark and Argentina have very different welfare systems, we still see that - at the psychological level - individuals reason about welfare redistribution in the same way.
‘In all three countries, physically strong males consistently pursue the self-interested position on redistribution.’
Men with low upper-body strength, on the other hand, were less likely to support their own self-interest.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic ... z2TTF4n1n9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic ... views.html
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
