Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:
and I was about to post
http://www.cyprus-mail.com/hydrocarbons ... ons/201305
You moron.
I can't thank you enough by proving to us once again what an illiterate you are, and the link you have provided above makes that point very clear, that you are an illiterate. But at least you are not alone. You got MR-from-NG and Lordo, the other 2 illiterate to lend a support making you all as the "Three Ring Illiterates".
Where does it say anything about the USA, EU or NATO for that matter, in what you say in this tread title? Rasmussen utters few empty words by saying "drilling for natural gas and oil should start only after there was a settlement of the Cyprus problem" just to throw some bones at Turkey to keep her happy for a while and you start distorting the facts to your illiterate way of seeing things. First of all, he used the word "should" and not "must", and secondly, it has nothing to do with Rasmussen what ever the RoC decides to do with it's Oil and Gas. He was just speaking for himself and not for NATO, since NATO had not taken a decision on the matter by all it's members. Thirdly, since the RoC is not in NATO, Rasmussen cannot tell the RoC what it should do and what it shouldn't do. He can only tell his NATO member states what they should do, like telling Turkey to act like a NATO member state and not as a Pirate member state going around threatening and stealing what belongs to others.
A serious question. Don't you ever get tired of being an illiterate retard?
By the way, the answer to Rasmussen's statement is a "NO", the RoC should not have to wait for a settlement to take place first before thew Oil & Gas comes up, because settlement will never happen at the rate Turkey is going about it and the AP of 2004 is the proof of that.
Clearly you are the moron as the message is quite clear only idiots like you try to twist it in order to save your stupidity by blaming others for not understanding what is being said, you even contradict yourself in the above post which we can all read and have a good
Clearly you cannot back your claim in what you claimed in the title of this thread, even with the link you have provided, just because you are an illiterate who does not comprehend what he reads.
Once again, you have been busted by me.
As for the rest of your post, just more gibberish.