Cyprus-Forum.com

[repulsewarrior]

...it is as i've said.

vp, you have done pretty well everything, except one step. you can say, first, Cyprus is my State, and i defend it because it represents me as an Individual, where without distinction or discrimination, all Citizens are Equally Sovereign as Cypriots.

as for your desire to be a Person, i stress, this is about Liberty, not Freedom. for your Constituency to exist as such, there must exist (at least one) other Cypriot Constituencies, its equal. I think if you can make it clear that in your Cyprus, the Cypriot Flag flys higher, then it is possible for other flags to exist.

...needless to say, the Republic needs reform, but to be a part of it, "Turkishness" or "Greekness" must be removed from "your" psyche, this won't happen if the exsistence of Cyprus remains threatened, nor if the Turkish Constituency continues to declare itself an equal to it. in a BBF there are (at least) three governing bodies, as the debate is framed, two levels of Goverment are ignored. it only serves Nationalists, the worst of which, "Greeks" and "Turks", have been unsuccessful in their aims since Independence. with conditions as they are, where the north and the south are tattered, playing this never ending game is more than expensive for both, now it is time to get to work against "them", as Cypriots, because as this island's Stewards it is more important to us.

...regardless of the scorn you will receive, i ask you, say, i love Cyprus, i am a Turk, but i am no "Turk", i respect that Greeks represent the overwhelming majority of the island's population, but they like me reject the "Greek" agenda because we are Cypriots first, we want Freedom, and Liberty too.

[Lordo]

Do you have a internationally recognized partnership agreement?

We HAD a constitution that included a 30% TC representation which they quickly abandoned, declared null & void, and ultimately replaced with a separatist entity.

Now, what is it you wish to say about this NULL & VOID agreement?

dream on null and void my left foot. it is there and it is intact. even when they increased the number of mps they did proportionately.

you will pay dearly for stealing the government - abaut 10%. so we keep all 37.5%.

enjoy

[bill cobbett]

Do you have a internationally recognized partnership agreement?

It's been suspended, put in abeyance and in very large measure, by an Invasion and 40 years of Occupation, the Big Mak/Rough D Agreement that K refers to, by the two High Level Agreements...and by loads of Talks to create "a New State of Affairs".

oh... and given all that, not to mention two attempts by "trnc" to declare a Two Countries UDI and loads of (failed) attempts at Recognition... only Fascist Fools would still piss in the wind by harping on about prior agreements.

[Lordo]

Do you have a internationally recognized partnership agreement?

It's been suspended, put in abeyance and in very large measure, by an Invasion and 40 years of Occupation, the Big Mak/Rough D Agreement that K refers to, by the two High Level Agreements...and by loads of Talks to create "a New State of Affairs".

oh... and given all that, not to mention two attempts by "trnc" to declare a Two Countries UDI and loads of (failed) attempts at Recognition... only Fascist Fools would still piss in the wind by harping on about prior agreements.

dream on dear boy dream on - it exists until you give up the north. sign on the dotted line if you can. somehow it aint gona happen so we will keep the north and share the gas. its a win win if you see what I mean

[bill cobbett]

Do you have a internationally recognized partnership agreement?

It's been suspended, put in abeyance and in very large measure, by an Invasion and 40 years of Occupation, the Big Mak/Rough D Agreement that K refers to, by the two High Level Agreements...and by loads of Talks to create "a New State of Affairs".

oh... and given all that, not to mention two attempts by "trnc" to declare a Two Countries UDI and loads of (failed) attempts at Recognition... only Fascist Fools would still piss in the wind by harping on about prior agreements.

dream on dear boy dream on - it exists until you give up the north. sign on the dotted line if you can. somehow it aint gona happen so we will keep the north and share the gas. its a win win if you see what I mean

Think that only a rabid and demented amoeba with half a braincell stands any chance of understanding what you mean Vordo... know what i mean...???

[Get Real!]

Do you have a internationally recognized partnership agreement?

We HAD a constitution that included a 30% TC representation which they quickly abandoned, declared null & void, and ultimately replaced with a separatist entity.

Now, what is it you wish to say about this NULL & VOID agreement?

dream on null and void my left foot. it is there and it is intact. even when they increased the number of mps they did proportionately.

you will pay dearly for stealing the government - abaut 10%. so we keep all 37.5%.

enjoy

Then you are OUT OF LINE with your community because they don’t seem to agree with your stance… they even say that the CyProb was solved in 1974.

Now, the only way you’ll ever see the RoC again is if you decide to live UNDER it not over it.

[Kikapu]

and I was about to post

http://www.cyprus-mail.com/hydrocarbons ... ons/201305

You moron.

I can't thank you enough by proving to us once again what an illiterate you are, and the link you have provided above makes that point very clear, that you are an illiterate. But at least you are not alone. You got MR-from-NG and Lordo, the other 2 illiterate to lend a support making you all as the "Three Ring Illiterates".

Where does it say anything about the USA, EU or NATO for that matter, in what you say in this tread title? Rasmussen utters few empty words by saying "drilling for natural gas and oil should start only after there was a settlement of the Cyprus problem" just to throw some bones at Turkey to keep her happy for a while and you start distorting the facts to your illiterate way of seeing things. First of all, he used the word "should" and not "must", and secondly, it has nothing to do with Rasmussen what ever the RoC decides to do with it's Oil and Gas. He was just speaking for himself and not for NATO, since NATO had not taken a decision on the matter by all it's members. Thirdly, since the RoC is not in NATO, Rasmussen cannot tell the RoC what it should do and what it shouldn't do. He can only tell his NATO member states what they should do, like telling Turkey to act like a NATO member state and not as a Pirate member state going around threatening and stealing what belongs to others.

A serious question. Don't you ever get tired of being an illiterate retard?

By the way, the answer to Rasmussen's statement is a "NO", the RoC should not have to wait for a settlement to take place first before thew Oil & Gas comes up, because settlement will never happen at the rate Turkey is going about it and the AP of 2004 is the proof of that.

[Get Real!]

dream on dear boy dream on - it exists until you give up the north. sign on the dotted line if you can. somehow it aint gona happen so we will keep the north and share the gas. its a win win if you see what I mean

Bring your face close Vordo and I'll give you some gas.

[Viewpoint]

Do you have a internationally recognized partnership agreement?

We HAD a constitution that included a 30% TC representation which they quickly abandoned, declared null & void, and ultimately replaced with a separatist entity.

Now, what is it you wish to say about this NULL & VOID agreement?

This is not unilaterally possible.

[Viewpoint]

and I was about to post

http://www.cyprus-mail.com/hydrocarbons ... ons/201305

You moron.

I can't thank you enough by proving to us once again what an illiterate you are, and the link you have provided above makes that point very clear, that you are an illiterate. But at least you are not alone. You got MR-from-NG and Lordo, the other 2 illiterate to lend a support making you all as the "Three Ring Illiterates".

Where does it say anything about the USA, EU or NATO for that matter, in what you say in this tread title? Rasmussen utters few empty words by saying "drilling for natural gas and oil should start only after there was a settlement of the Cyprus problem" just to throw some bones at Turkey to keep her happy for a while and you start distorting the facts to your illiterate way of seeing things. First of all, he used the word "should" and not "must", and secondly, it has nothing to do with Rasmussen what ever the RoC decides to do with it's Oil and Gas. He was just speaking for himself and not for NATO, since NATO had not taken a decision on the matter by all it's members. Thirdly, since the RoC is not in NATO, Rasmussen cannot tell the RoC what it should do and what it shouldn't do. He can only tell his NATO member states what they should do, like telling Turkey to act like a NATO member state and not as a Pirate member state going around threatening and stealing what belongs to others.

A serious question. Don't you ever get tired of being an illiterate retard?

By the way, the answer to Rasmussen's statement is a "NO", the RoC should not have to wait for a settlement to take place first before thew Oil & Gas comes up, because settlement will never happen at the rate Turkey is going about it and the AP of 2004 is the proof of that.

Clearly you are the moron as the message is quite clear only idiots like you try to twist it in order to save your stupidity by blaming others for not understanding what is being said, you even contradict yourself in the above post which we can all read and have a good