Cyprus-Forum.com

[Kikapu]

Back tracking to save your ignorant arse again, where did I say it would be word for word, what I have stated was that it will be adjusted in parts but the foundations will be the AP as the UN will not scrap it to start from ground zero. Now this develop catched the GCs off guard because they wanted to hold off on negotiaitons until after reeping benefits from gas. With pressure being applied form all partied concerned it will be interesting to see how the Gcs and keep from being the bad guys once again....interesting times ahead.

There is NOTHING you can impose on a UN member without a UNSC enforceable resolution passing.

How many decades will it take you to understand that? You must be hard at learning…

The RoC has completely dumped you and you will see their 180 degree change in attitude towards you from now on because community negotiations are well and truly over.

Says who, need I remind you once again that you are bound by internaitonal agreements, ignore them at your own will but as soon as you do recognition will rear its head.

What agreements?

1960.

Denktash and Makarios for all intent purposes had walked away from the 1960 agreements when they had agreed on BBF in 1976. Why do you think the RoC has been doing anything it wants without any input from their so called "partner", the TCs, and cannot be forced to accept anything that is against EU principles, specially now that the RoC is in the EU since 2004, with the world going along with the RoC.

[Kikapu]

It is no secret that after the destruction of the financial sector after the imposition of the memorandum will be served version of the Annan Plan.

Where is Kikapoooo when you want to rub his face in it?

better solution from a well respected greek journalist (Stavros Lygerou).

So we are now to take what this Greek journalist says seriously as you do.

Even then, he is talking about a version of the AP and not the 2004 version of the AP.

Then again, you are an illiterate and are not able to distinguish what is written and what it's meant. As soon as you see the words "Annan Plan", you automatically think AP of 2004 as the stating point in the future for a settlement. Dream on.

As I explained to you before, you can keep the title of any settlement plan in Cyprus as being called the "Annan Plan". It is it's contents I'm interested in.Titles means nothing to me as it does to you.

I too will accept a version of the AP as a True Federation, as long as it is in line with the EU Principles, which the 2004 version of the AP was not.

Back tracking to save your ignorant arse again, where did I say it would be word for word, what I have stated was that it will be adjusted in parts but the foundations will be the AP as the UN will not scrap it to start from ground zero. Now this develop catched the GCs off guard because they wanted to hold off on negotiaitons until after reeping benefits from gas. With pressure being applied form all partied concerned it will be interesting to see how the Gcs and keep from being the bad guys once again....interesting times ahead.

You stated recently not only you want what's in the AP of 2004, but you want more so called "safeguards", which means in plain English, to be able to violate others Human Rights more so that you can enjoy the spoils of war better.

By the way, you still haven't thanked the GCs for saying OXI to the AP in 2004 for saving the "trnc" from similar economic problems. Why won't you thank the GCs?

[Kikapu]

GCs angered at declarations made by the USA UN and EU that the Cyprus problem has to be solved before the benefits of Gas can effectively be utilized. Even a 3 month time frame is being spoken of.....at last pressure where its due...thhis will put the cat amongst the pigeons....lets see how your leader will approach this bottleneck, will he be brave enough to take the bull by the horns and be sincere in finding a solution.

The link, please!

Let me ask again. Where is the fcuking link?

[Viewpoint]

GCs angered at declarations made by the USA UN and EU that the Cyprus problem has to be solved before the benefits of Gas can effectively be utilized. Even a 3 month time frame is being spoken of.....at last pressure where its due...thhis will put the cat amongst the pigeons....lets see how your leader will approach this bottleneck, will he be brave enough to take the bull by the horns and be sincere in finding a solution.

The link, please!

Let me ask again. Where is the fcuking link?

Why do you want the link? go read in the Kibris newspaper.

[Kikapu]

GCs angered at declarations made by the USA UN and EU that the Cyprus problem has to be solved before the benefits of Gas can effectively be utilized. Even a 3 month time frame is being spoken of.....at last pressure where its due...thhis will put the cat amongst the pigeons....lets see how your leader will approach this bottleneck, will he be brave enough to take the bull by the horns and be sincere in finding a solution.

The link, please!

Let me ask again. Where is the fcuking link?

Why do you want the link? go read in the Kibris newspaper.

Say no more!

[Viewpoint]

GCs angered at declarations made by the USA UN and EU that the Cyprus problem has to be solved before the benefits of Gas can effectively be utilized. Even a 3 month time frame is being spoken of.....at last pressure where its due...thhis will put the cat amongst the pigeons....lets see how your leader will approach this bottleneck, will he be brave enough to take the bull by the horns and be sincere in finding a solution.

The link, please!

Let me ask again. Where is the fcuking link?

Why do you want the link? go read in the Kibris newspaper.

Say no more!

and I was about to post

http://www.cyprus-mail.com/hydrocarbons ... ons/201305

You moron.

[MR-from-NG]

This wanna be Greek is very thick skinned. He'll come back with some shit of an excuse no doubt

[Maximus]

So far the US and the EU which comprises all of NATO, except Turkey, are saying otherwise. How much weight and faith do you want to assign to Rasmussen's words? NATO is charged with protecting its members. NATO is essentially a protectorate for the EU and the US. Cyprus is not a threat for NATO to get involved, it is an EU member state.

A European Parliament readmission report on Turkey is being drafted and it seems its just more real harsh criticism. Possibly the harshest yet. The report will argue that Turkey has 'a parallel agenda' and is going nowhere but reiterates that Turkey must recognise the sovereign integrity of the RoC. Either way, the gas is about 5 years away.

There is still no satisfactory answer to this question in case this continues up to then. How is Turkey going to stop Cyprus drilling in her own EEZ?

http://www.todayszaman.com/news-315447- ... urkey.html

[Get Real!]

From the link above...

"Drawing attention to the Cypriot problem, the draft says Turkey has not accepted the integrity of the EU by not recognizing the Greek Cypriot administration as the sole representative of the island."

And don't ever forget that TCs.

[Viewpoint]

So far the US and the EU which comprises all of NATO, except Turkey, are saying otherwise. How much weight and faith do you want to assign to Rasmussen's words? NATO is charged with protecting its members. NATO is essentially a protectorate for the EU and the US. Cyprus is not a threat for NATO to get involved, it is an EU member state.

A European Parliament readmission report on Turkey is being drafted and it seems its just more real harsh criticism. Possibly the harshest yet. The report will argue that Turkey has 'a parallel agenda' and is going nowhere but reiterates that Turkey must recognise the sovereign integrity of the RoC. Either way, the gas is about 5 years away.

There is still no satisfactory answer to this question in case this continues up to then. How is Turkey going to stop Cyprus drilling in her own EEZ?

http://www.todayszaman.com/news-315447- ... urkey.html

What ever way you wanna dress it up there is something brewing behind the scenes which is the force that will push both sides back to the negotiating table to find a solution before you get the gas to market.