by Maximus » Fri Apr 26, 2013 5:14 pm
Here is the most popular reply in the comments section.
The persistence of your misinformation around the Annan plan is becoming tiresome.
Greek-Cypriots did not reject the Annan plan because they already knew they would join the EU. The Annan plan was rejected because:
- it failed to guarantee the safety of Greek Cypriots,
- it included no provisions for removal of turkish troops and allowed further military intervention by Turkey,
- it legitimized the settlers living on Greek property,
- and ABOVE ALL it denied Greek refugees the right to recover the property taken from them by Turkey (200,000 Greek Cypriots were forced from their homes).
In fact, while turkish Cypriots would have had full right of return, the plan denied to all Greek Cypriots rights enjoyed by all other EU citizens (right of free movement and residence, the right to apply to work in any position, the right to vote)
Furthermore, the Annan plan disregarded the Geneva Convention of 1949, section III, article 49, which prohibits colonization by an occupying power. Article 49 states in its last paragraph: "The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies." Since 1974 turkey has occupied over 39% of the island and has stationed 50,000 turkish troops along with an estimated 200,000 settlers from turkey, so the Annan plan would have legitimized these attempt to alter the island's demography.
Above all, the Annan plan guaranteed that turkish Cypriots receive all their basic demands from the first day of implementation, but postponed without guarantee all basic Greek Cypriots' demands who would depend upon the good will of turkey to fulfil the obligations it undertakes.
In short, there is no economic meltdown big enough to force ANY nation to accept such a one-sided solution. Nor does Turkey's past behavior (invasion, occupation of Cyprus, usurping Greek Cypriot property) indicates a trustworthy partner for a gas pipeline through Turkey.