Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:
Obviously you are the moron who continues to twist and turn with the wind...like it or not the AP will be the foundation any future solution which is what I have been saying from day one whereas you have used every word in the dictionary to try and trick people other wise.
Only recently you stated that you wouldn't even accept the 2004 AP and that it was the rejection of the AP by the GCs in 2004 that brought about today's economic situation in the RoC which has spared the TCs of the same, so now you are back at it again that the AP of 2004 will be the foundations of any future settlement. Aren't you once again contradicting yourself?
By the way, you still haven't said "thank you, thank you, thank you" to the GCs for voting OXI to the AP in 2004 which have spared the TCs of the economic situation facing the RoC. Aren't you being rude by not saying thank you to them!
The old AP which will be used as a foundation will now have to be more strict and stringent against the problems of the south....in time they will be begging for the return of AP 5.
It's funny how in the last 4 years of negotiations, the AP rejected by the GCs was not used as a starting point, and even today, Anastasiades does not back the AP of 2004 which he had supported in 2004. Just because some individual writes an article in the economist about the AP for a settlement, you get all excited over nothing and forget about the last 4 years. Above your other deficiencies in comprehending things, you also have a very short memory. Must be related to the size of your brain.
