Paphitis wrote:Maybe! I'm not an expert. Really I have no idea.
The way I see it is like this. The RoC can't make a go of a cut throat and competitive industry such as Airlines. These types of businesses don't do well at all as a Public Company. You need a very dynamic team running an efficient and lean operation.
Casinos are different. No one can stuff them up and they are a licence to print money.
Private Casinos can be dangerous as well you know. With the ammount of Russian Money floating about the place, I would hate for these Casinos to fall into the hands of Russian Mafia and see Cypriots get beat up in dark alleys and so forth. In Las Vegas, there has been some very sleazy going ons with Casinos and Mafia which has cost the lives of who knows how many.
Casinos can be very dangerous to the people, so it must be tightly controlled by the Government and Cyprus could do with the money.
Well, the government has proven that they are fiscally incompetent...
They have also proven that they are not beyond sleaze and dodgy dealings with Russian money...
It is clear they have no expertise in running casinos... they'd have to buy that in using expensive consultants...
it would be much better just to let the experts deal with it...
And casinos are NOT dangerous to the people at all... People don't need the nanny state to look after them... If you control casinos tightly (to protect the vulnerable) you will merely spoil them for the VAST majority who enjoy gambling and can do so in safely...
Problem gamblers, people that can not control their habit will be just as likely to gamble on the colour of the next car to pull up at traffic lights as the next number on a roulette table...
I will point out that there are people who are vulnerable to gambling, alcohol and drugs... The most tightly controlled of these (drugs) allows no advertising, no glitzy packets, no high street outlets, no internet sales - in fact drugs are completely banned... yet 'vulnerable' people still become addicted to drugs...
A casino which is designed to protect the 'vulnerable' will be a very unpopular place indeed....