Jerry wrote:Tim Drayton wrote:B25 wrote:Tim Drayton wrote:In my view, absolutely the worst part of this deal is that Cyprus has agreed (been forced) to reduce its banking sector to EU average levels in terms of its share of GDP by 2018. This is preposterous. It violates the basic principle of international law of the sovereignty of nations and the right to self determination. Nobody can dictate to another country what the size of its banking sector is to be. This also violates every principle of the the liberal free-market economic order that is supposed to exist in the EU and most of the world. Once the hurly burly dies down, the Cyprus government must fight this unjust and illegal measure in every available tribunal.
Tim i do agree, but, they didn't just come along and demand or instruct this. It was us that went for aid and they only greed to that aid IF we did this. We were free to reject it, but the consequences ould have been worst. I guess this would be thei get ou clause.
That said, it was criminal, immoral and bloody well discraceful the treatment they gave us.
Onwards and upwards and looking ahead. We need new ideas new initiatives and a different way of thinking.
I guess this will also put back the cypro even further ......
Yes, I understand - I put "been forced" in brackets, but I do not believe that it holds water under international law. A sovereign nation cannot, even so-called voluntarily, give up its sovereignty and right to self determination.
Tim, Cyprus has never been and is not, strictly speaking, a sovereign nation. How can it be, when other States have the legal right to intevene with military force? Cyprus was even expected to accept the illegal Annan Plan and was rebuked for not doing so. Cypriots are always accused of blaming others for their misfortune - they have good reason to.
I'm not sure any international Court will be prepared to listen to the ROC, after all the ECHR abandoned its duty to displaced Greek Cypriots when it accepted the IPC as a legitimate route for claiming compensation. The IPC has resolved 300 cases out of 4000 applications in six years, where's the justice in that?
Cyprus has every right to run its economy as it sees fit but its bankers made fundamental errors in putting all its eggs in the Greek basket and in making loans to developers in the belief that the housing boom would go on for ever. Instead of helping Cyprus our EU "friends" decided to put the boot in, gave us a good kicking and expect us to function as before despite our injuries. Cyprus can expect regular kickings until the oil starts to flow, maybe the boot will be on the other foot then.
Tim Drayton wrote: Obviously it is a matter for experts in international law to deliberate on, but I still think every effort should be made to fight it. It is clearly not an immediate priority. There are five years until 2018.
Tim Drayton wrote:In my view, absolutely the worst part of this deal is that Cyprus has agreed (been forced) to reduce its banking sector to EU average levels in terms of its share of GDP by 2018. This is preposterous. It violates the basic principle of international law of the sovereignty of nations and the right to self determination. Nobody can dictate to another country what the size of its banking sector is to be. This also violates every principle of the the liberal free-market economic order that is supposed to exist in the EU and most of the world. Once the hurly burly dies down, the Cyprus government must fight this unjust and illegal measure in every available tribunal.
B25 wrote:Fine words Paphiti, and welcome back, I agree to a large extent to what you say.
May the force be with us. united we stand, united we shall fall.
Amen
Tim Drayton wrote:B25 wrote:Tim Drayton wrote:In my view, absolutely the worst part of this deal is that Cyprus has agreed (been forced) to reduce its banking sector to EU average levels in terms of its share of GDP by 2018. This is preposterous. It violates the basic principle of international law of the sovereignty of nations and the right to self determination. Nobody can dictate to another country what the size of its banking sector is to be. This also violates every principle of the the liberal free-market economic order that is supposed to exist in the EU and most of the world. Once the hurly burly dies down, the Cyprus government must fight this unjust and illegal measure in every available tribunal.
Tim i do agree, but, they didn't just come along and demand or instruct this. It was us that went for aid and they only greed to that aid IF we did this. We were free to reject it, but the consequences ould have been worst. I guess this would be thei get ou clause.
That said, it was criminal, immoral and bloody well discraceful the treatment they gave us.
Onwards and upwards and looking ahead. We need new ideas new initiatives and a different way of thinking.
I guess this will also put back the cypro even further ......
Yes, I understand - I put "been forced" in brackets, but I do not believe that it holds water under international law. A sovereign nation cannot, even so-called voluntarily, give up its sovereignty and right to self determination.
finnish wrote:Thanks for all people on Cyprus!
We just lost 10000$ because of yours...
Euro lost all most 10 cents against USD with in last month. Peoples on Cyprus are angry for EU but in fact cypruses had cause so much trouble for all other European citizen with these bank conflict so all people in European area should be angry for Cyprus!
You don’t have any kind of reason burn European Union flags there we should burn yours flag here other countries. In fact we don’t be so ridiculous that we do so. Flags burns only in deepest jungle and by Beudins in the desserts.
Regards from Finland
Return to Cyprus and the European Union
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests