supporttheunderdog wrote:GreekIslandGirl wrote:supporttheunderdog wrote:GreekIslandGirl wrote:I don't think we should sell any of our national assets, if it can be avoided. Cypriots worked hard to rebuild the economy since the 1974 invasion - and are still suffering from the loss of more than half their territorial assets.
is 37 more or less than 50?
As well as the northern part of the island originally (pre-1974) having most of the hotels, infrastructure and agriculture per meter of land; the RoC has lost control of
over 50% of its coastline; which being a tourist destination is a very valuable commodity.
Cyprus, the third largest island in the Mediterranean Sea, has a coastline of 735 km in length: 295 km under the control of the Republic of Cyprus (40%), 370 km under Turkish occupation since 1974 and inaccessible (50,3%) and 70 km within the Sovereign British Military Bases.
ah, coast line, the same argument Turkey fallaciously deploys to justify its illegal claims over the EEZ of the ROC, but only 37% of the land area, the territory, is occupied.
What are you talking about? The coastline I refer to is the land territory, the beach, that defines the island and not coastal waters or EEZ. Are you now disputing geography to support Turkey's occupation?
And why do you insist on saying
"only 37% of the land area"? Have you measured every mountain in Kyrenia? I told you Cyprus has lost
>50% territorial assets - the main being the beaches (50.3%). But also, hotels, infrastructure, monuments Churches etc - these are the territorial assets not just plain fields.
Now, try to be cogent instead of playing your silly points.