The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


the (russian) empire strikes back

Feel free to talk about anything that you want.

Re: the (russian) empire strikes back

Postby supporttheunderdog » Wed Mar 20, 2013 8:55 pm

GreekIslandGirl wrote:I don't think we should sell any of our national assets, if it can be avoided. Cypriots worked hard to rebuild the economy since the 1974 invasion - and are still suffering from the loss of more than half their territorial assets.


is 37 more or less than 50?
User avatar
supporttheunderdog
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8397
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:03 pm
Location: limassol

Re: the (russian) empire strikes back

Postby GreekIslandGirl » Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:22 pm

supporttheunderdog wrote:
GreekIslandGirl wrote:I don't think we should sell any of our national assets, if it can be avoided. Cypriots worked hard to rebuild the economy since the 1974 invasion - and are still suffering from the loss of more than half their territorial assets.


is 37 more or less than 50?


As well as the northern part of the island originally (pre-1974) having most of the hotels, infrastructure and agriculture per meter of land; the RoC has lost control of over 50% of its coastline; which being a tourist destination is a very valuable commodity.

Cyprus, the third largest island in the Mediterranean Sea, has a coastline of 735 km in length: 295 km under the control of the Republic of Cyprus (40%), 370 km under Turkish occupation since 1974 and inaccessible (50,3%) and 70 km within the Sovereign British Military Bases.
User avatar
GreekIslandGirl
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9083
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 1:03 am

Re: the (russian) empire strikes back

Postby supporttheunderdog » Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:41 pm

GreekIslandGirl wrote:
supporttheunderdog wrote:
GreekIslandGirl wrote:I don't think we should sell any of our national assets, if it can be avoided. Cypriots worked hard to rebuild the economy since the 1974 invasion - and are still suffering from the loss of more than half their territorial assets.


is 37 more or less than 50?


As well as the northern part of the island originally (pre-1974) having most of the hotels, infrastructure and agriculture per meter of land; the RoC has lost control of over 50% of its coastline; which being a tourist destination is a very valuable commodity.

Cyprus, the third largest island in the Mediterranean Sea, has a coastline of 735 km in length: 295 km under the control of the Republic of Cyprus (40%), 370 km under Turkish occupation since 1974 and inaccessible (50,3%) and 70 km within the Sovereign British Military Bases.

ah, coast line, the same argument Turkey fallaciously deploys to justify its illegal claims over the EEZ of the ROC, but only 37% of the land area, the territory, is occupied.
User avatar
supporttheunderdog
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8397
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:03 pm
Location: limassol

Re: the (russian) empire strikes back

Postby GreekIslandGirl » Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:52 pm

supporttheunderdog wrote:
GreekIslandGirl wrote:
supporttheunderdog wrote:
GreekIslandGirl wrote:I don't think we should sell any of our national assets, if it can be avoided. Cypriots worked hard to rebuild the economy since the 1974 invasion - and are still suffering from the loss of more than half their territorial assets.


is 37 more or less than 50?


As well as the northern part of the island originally (pre-1974) having most of the hotels, infrastructure and agriculture per meter of land; the RoC has lost control of over 50% of its coastline; which being a tourist destination is a very valuable commodity.

Cyprus, the third largest island in the Mediterranean Sea, has a coastline of 735 km in length: 295 km under the control of the Republic of Cyprus (40%), 370 km under Turkish occupation since 1974 and inaccessible (50,3%) and 70 km within the Sovereign British Military Bases.

ah, coast line, the same argument Turkey fallaciously deploys to justify its illegal claims over the EEZ of the ROC, but only 37% of the land area, the territory, is occupied.


What are you talking about? The coastline I refer to is the land territory, the beach, that defines the island and not coastal waters or EEZ. Are you now disputing geography to support Turkey's occupation?

And why do you insist on saying "only 37% of the land area"? Have you measured every mountain in Kyrenia? I told you Cyprus has lost >50% territorial assets - the main being the beaches (50.3%). But also, hotels, infrastructure, monuments Churches etc - these are the territorial assets not just plain fields.

Now, try to be cogent instead of playing your silly points.
User avatar
GreekIslandGirl
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9083
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 1:03 am

Re: the (russian) empire strikes back

Postby cyprusgrump » Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:17 pm

GreekIslandGirl wrote:
supporttheunderdog wrote:
GreekIslandGirl wrote:
supporttheunderdog wrote:
GreekIslandGirl wrote:I don't think we should sell any of our national assets, if it can be avoided. Cypriots worked hard to rebuild the economy since the 1974 invasion - and are still suffering from the loss of more than half their territorial assets.


is 37 more or less than 50?


As well as the northern part of the island originally (pre-1974) having most of the hotels, infrastructure and agriculture per meter of land; the RoC has lost control of over 50% of its coastline; which being a tourist destination is a very valuable commodity.

Cyprus, the third largest island in the Mediterranean Sea, has a coastline of 735 km in length: 295 km under the control of the Republic of Cyprus (40%), 370 km under Turkish occupation since 1974 and inaccessible (50,3%) and 70 km within the Sovereign British Military Bases.

ah, coast line, the same argument Turkey fallaciously deploys to justify its illegal claims over the EEZ of the ROC, but only 37% of the land area, the territory, is occupied.


What are you talking about? The coastline I refer to is the land territory, the beach, that defines the island and not coastal waters or EEZ. Are you now disputing geography to support Turkey's occupation?

And why do you insist on saying "only 37% of the land area"? Have you measured every mountain in Kyrenia? I told you Cyprus has lost >50% territorial assets - the main being the beaches (50.3%). But also, hotels, infrastructure, monuments Churches etc - these are the territorial assets not just plain fields.

Now, try to be cogent instead of playing your silly points.


So, what percentage of the land area of Cyprus is occupied by them...?

You should know, you have posted it enough times on this forum... :roll:

40%, 40%, 40%, like a demented parrot... but now you claim it is ">50% [of] territorial assets"...?

You couldn't make it up....
User avatar
cyprusgrump
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8520
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:35 pm
Location: Pissouri, Cyprus

Re: the (russian) empire strikes back

Postby danny1234 » Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:53 pm

GreekIslandGirl wrote:
supporttheunderdog wrote:
GreekIslandGirl wrote:
supporttheunderdog wrote:
GreekIslandGirl wrote:I don't think we should sell any of our national assets, if it can be avoided. Cypriots worked hard to rebuild the economy since the 1974 invasion - and are still suffering from the loss of more than half their territorial assets.


is 37 more or less than 50?


As well as the northern part of the island originally (pre-1974) having most of the hotels, infrastructure and agriculture per meter of land; the RoC has lost control of over 50% of its coastline; which being a tourist destination is a very valuable commodity.

Cyprus, the third largest island in the Mediterranean Sea, has a coastline of 735 km in length: 295 km under the control of the Republic of Cyprus (40%), 370 km under Turkish occupation since 1974 and inaccessible (50,3%) and 70 km within the Sovereign British Military Bases.

ah, coast line, the same argument Turkey fallaciously deploys to justify its illegal claims over the EEZ of the ROC, but only 37% of the land area, the territory, is occupied.


What are you talking about? The coastline I refer to is the land territory, the beach, that defines the island and not coastal waters or EEZ. Are you now disputing geography to support Turkey's occupation?

And why do you insist on saying "only 37% of the land area"? Have you measured every mountain in Kyrenia? I told you Cyprus has lost >50% territorial assets - the main being the beaches (50.3%). But also, hotels, infrastructure, monuments Churches etc - these are the territorial assets not just plain fields.

Now, try to be cogent instead of playing your silly points.



I understand you are a fat tart living as a chav in a London council flat, probably overdosing on chocolate and cakes, too much sugar if giving your brain a rush and that is why you spout so much crap. You are a bloody lunatic that gets everything wrong. Try eating some GREEK yoghurt and dieting. :lol: :lol: :lol:
danny1234
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 9:18 am

Re: the (russian) empire strikes back

Postby supporttheunderdog » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:05 pm

when have I ever supported the Tur*sh occupation,.....??I have always roundly condemned that continuing evil act.

The fact remains that 37% of the land area is occupied - and yes it probably does contain a greater percentage of assets, most of which are rightfully owned by the displaced Greek speaking Cypriots, whose right of return I generally support, along with that of Turkish Speaking Cypriots to return to properties they left in the Free areas.
User avatar
supporttheunderdog
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8397
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:03 pm
Location: limassol

Re: the (russian) empire strikes back

Postby tsukoui » Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:06 pm

danny1234 wrote:I understand you are a fat tart living as a chav in a London council flat, probably overdosing on chocolate and cakes, too much sugar if giving your brain a rush and that is why you spout so much crap. You are a bloody lunatic that gets everything wrong. Try eating some GREEK yoghurt and dieting. :lol: :lol: :lol:


Have you read "Chavs: The Demonization of the Working Class"?

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Chavs-Demonization-Working-Owen-Jones/dp/1844678644

My only problem with GiG is that she doesn't embrace our Turkish Cypriot compatriots (I'm not talking about the settlers)...
tsukoui
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1063
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:10 pm

Re: the (russian) empire strikes back

Postby Oceanside50 » Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:19 am

What Ms Oracle is trying to say, is that after the Turk invasion in 74, Cyprus as a whole actually lost more then 50% of its economic output potential, probably closer to 75-80%...Firstly the agricultural lands,( thousands of acres) between Morphou, Kyrenia and the fertile plain between Famagusta and Nicosia. Secondly the coastline, from Morphou to Kyrenia to Famagusta is a cash cow producing industry(tourism) for an island like Cyprus. For instance, Famagusta prior to 74 had more 5 star Hotels, then all of Cyprus has today...Another thing lost which may be more significant then all economic sectors lost during the invasion, is peace of mind, which I think most non-native to Cyprus dont feel or understand...
Oceanside50
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2296
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 5:45 pm

Re: the (russian) empire strikes back

Postby B0B » Thu Mar 21, 2013 2:00 pm

i see there are no moderators in this place and everyone is allowed to wreck havoc on any thread they want
what have obama and the turkish invasion and your personal bickering anything to do with the subject of the thread?
trolls
B0B
Member
Member
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:10 pm

PreviousNext

Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest