userfromgermany wrote:I think the best solution would be to replace our interest based money debt system by a new money debt system WITHOUT interests.
See Silvio Gesell. Interest system works only after a war to construct a whole country, but once constructed, we should switch money system.
Keynes on Gesell's ideas:
The idea behind stamped money is sound. It is, indeed, possible that means might be found to apply it in practice on a modest scale. But there are many difficulties which Gesell did not face. In particular, he was unaware that money was not unique in having a liquidity-premium attached to it, but differed only in degree from many other articles, deriving its importance from having a greater liquidity-premium than any other article. Thus if currency notes were to be deprived of their liquidity-premium by the stamping system, a long series of substitutes would step into their shoes - bank-money, debts at call, foreign money, jewellery and the precious metals generally, and so forth. As I have mentioned above, there have been times when it was probably the craving for the ownership of land, independently of its yield, which served to keep up the rate of interest; - though under Gesell's system this possibility would have been eliminated by land nationalisation.
from http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~roehrigw/keynes/engl.htm