The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Cyprus to Join Partnership for Peace

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Re: Cyprus to Join Partnership for Peace

Postby boulio » Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:36 pm

Lordo enosis with the junta was out of the question for makarios in 1967.tke reason that makarios rejected the meetings between denktash and clerides was for the fact that makarios believed that for the accepting of the 13 points the Turks would get the enclaves and the separate municipalities legalized.do I think makarios made a mistake in hindsight in not accepting local autonomy for the tc ,yes I do but he didn't reject them because of enosis not being included.
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Re: Cyprus to Join Partnership for Peace

Postby Lordo » Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:49 pm

boulio wrote:Lordo enosis with the junta was out of the question for makarios in 1967.tke reason that makarios rejected the meetings between denktash and clerides was for the fact that makarios believed that for the accepting of the 13 points the Turks would get the enclaves and the separate municipalities legalized.do I think makarios made a mistake in hindsight in not accepting local autonomy for the tc ,yes I do but he didn't reject them because of enosis not being included.

makarios voted for enosis in 1967. facts speak for themselves. read some proper info to see what makrios said about the 1972 agreement. enough of making history as we go along.
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 22327
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free. Walk on Swine walk on

Re: Cyprus to Join Partnership for Peace

Postby boulio » Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:07 am

I have read and that's my opinion and conclusion
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Re: Cyprus to Join Partnership for Peace

Postby repulsewarrior » Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:45 am

...where does the first attempt on Makarios' life fall in all of this?
User avatar
repulsewarrior
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 14278
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 2:13 am
Location: homeless in Canada

Re: Cyprus to Join Partnership for Peace

Postby repulsewarrior » Wed Mar 13, 2013 3:33 am

...never mind the second or the third, and let's not forget the fourth, with its coup, facts as you say, are facts, the so called Greeks, did not rise up to take arms against the man it seems between them and enosis with Greece; Cypriots exist.

...Lordo, please.
User avatar
repulsewarrior
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 14278
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 2:13 am
Location: homeless in Canada

Re: Cyprus to Join Partnership for Peace

Postby repulsewarrior » Wed Mar 13, 2013 3:57 am

Lordo wrote:rw a treaty is a treaty is treaty, once signed it has to respected. otherwise jungle rule applies.


...exactly vp (and Lordo), you have problems about having a choice because by your terms, Cyprus was British and not Turkish when it came time to choose. Turkey has nothing to say, in effect, if once signed a treaty has to be respected. under Ottoman rule, Cyprus became a backwater, it was lost accordingly, and with the coming of the Modern Age it was too late to make a claim, as though the Civilian population amounted to chattel on Property like in the Age past, between Imperialists.

...Cyprus exists.
User avatar
repulsewarrior
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 14278
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 2:13 am
Location: homeless in Canada

Re: Cyprus to Join Partnership for Peace

Postby Viewpoint » Wed Mar 13, 2013 8:34 am

repulsewarrior wrote:
Lordo wrote:rw a treaty is a treaty is treaty, once signed it has to respected. otherwise jungle rule applies.


...exactly vp (and Lordo), you have problems about having a choice because by your terms, Cyprus was British and not Turkish when it came time to choose. Turkey has nothing to say, in effect, if once signed a treaty has to be respected. under Ottoman rule, Cyprus became a backwater, it was lost accordingly, and with the coming of the Modern Age it was too late to make a claim, as though the Civilian population amounted to chattel on Property like in the Age past, between Imperialists.

...Cyprus exists.


Of course Cyprus exists, divided.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Re: Cyprus to Join Partnership for Peace

Postby bill cobbett » Wed Mar 13, 2013 2:22 pm

According to the CY Mail today, the US Ambassador to CY is quite happy for closer CY/NATO ties and for CY to join the PfP.

... and what the US wants in NATO, the US gets. So much for the alleged Turkish 'veto"...

..."THE UNITED States welcomes Cyprus’ commitment to strengthen ties with the transatlantic security organisation NATO, US ambassador to Nicosia John Koenig said yesterday.
He also called for a careful planning of the new government’s stated goal of joining NATO’s anteroom, the Partnership for Peace (PfP) programme, to ensure a positive effect on EU-NATO relations..."
User avatar
bill cobbett
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 15759
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Embargoed from Kyrenia by Jurkish Army and Genocided (many times) by Thieving, Brain-Washed Lordo

Re: Cyprus to Join Partnership for Peace

Postby Jerry » Wed Mar 13, 2013 4:20 pm

bill cobbett wrote:According to the CY Mail today, the US Ambassador to CY is quite happy for closer CY/NATO ties and for CY to join the PfP.

... and what the US wants in NATO, the US gets. So much for the alleged Turkish 'veto"...

..."THE UNITED States welcomes Cyprus’ commitment to strengthen ties with the transatlantic security organisation NATO, US ambassador to Nicosia John Koenig said yesterday.
He also called for a careful planning of the new government’s stated goal of joining NATO’s anteroom, the Partnership for Peace (PfP) programme, to ensure a positive effect on EU-NATO relations..."



Britain will only have one significant overseas base soon (after it quits Germany for good) - in Cyprus. With Cyprus in Nato I wonder how long it would be before UK tries to negotiate the handing over of the Cyprus bases to the US to save some more cash. I remember the Americans kicked up a big fuss when Denis Healy tried to give up Cyprus bases in the 1960s. What price would the ROC ask to agree to such a handover?
Jerry
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4730
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: UK

Re: Cyprus to Join Partnership for Peace

Postby Viewpoint » Wed Mar 13, 2013 4:25 pm

Jerry wrote:
bill cobbett wrote:According to the CY Mail today, the US Ambassador to CY is quite happy for closer CY/NATO ties and for CY to join the PfP.

... and what the US wants in NATO, the US gets. So much for the alleged Turkish 'veto"...

..."THE UNITED States welcomes Cyprus’ commitment to strengthen ties with the transatlantic security organisation NATO, US ambassador to Nicosia John Koenig said yesterday.
He also called for a careful planning of the new government’s stated goal of joining NATO’s anteroom, the Partnership for Peace (PfP) programme, to ensure a positive effect on EU-NATO relations..."



Britain will only have one significant overseas base soon (after it quits Germany for good) - in Cyprus. With Cyprus in Nato I wonder how long it would be before UK tries to negotiate the handing over of the Cyprus bases to the US to save some more cash. I remember the Americans kicked up a big fuss when Denis Healy tried to give up Cyprus bases in the 1960s. What price would the ROC ask to agree to such a handover?


You have to get our permission.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests