Ok, I corrected the second quote, it was a mistake and not intentional since I gave the address of the original article also.
This doesn't change anything though. It just shows that the aim of
both Talat and Denctash is exactly the same with the only difference that Talat is more diplomatic and fits the image that the Erdogan government wants to project. They both have as aim the partition, and this is obvious from what they both said.
So, are you going to use the excuse of the second quote to avoid answering the question?
Before I address your points, what was your view on the liturgy? Did Neophytos commit a foul or did he do well?
I believe it was a foul, and is always a foul to pass to the occupied areas by showing an ID or any other document. I can understand the refugees to go see their homes, I can't judge them. But the rest that go there to eat, play at the casinos, or just for fun are totally unexcused. The same goes for politicians. No politician should go by showing an id, and this is more than a foul.
Now if the politicians were not there, and the applauses to Talat didn't happen, then I could excuse the deeply religious people to go. As we all know though many people that went there were not religious at all, so church for them could be very easily avoided because as we saw such events are not considered by Turkish Cypriots as something that brings friendship but as something that recognizes their illegal state. Talat said it clearly: "Greek Orthodox liturgy to take place at the Ayios Mammas church in Morph this week has done more for the Turkish Cypriot cause than any high-cost promotion campaign could even have done."
This is exactly what I was telling you for all this time but you didn't believe me.