Dear Comrade,
I have been somewhat disappointed with Xinhua's coverage of Cyprus for some time now.
This latest article is case in point.
You write:
"Anastasiades, the Democratic Rally party candidate, won 45.46 percent of the votes, followed by ruling left-wing AKEL party candidate Malas who gained 26.91 percent of the votes. Independent candidate George Lillikas took the third place with 24.93 percent of the votes."
Malas is in fact as independent a candidate as Lillikas. Malas is an independent candidate backed by the Communist Party AKEL and Lillikas is an independent candidate backed by the Socialist Party EDEK.
Thus the total left-wing vote is more than the right-wing vote.
However you would not get this impression from what you have written which is just mimicking the spin of the capitalist press.
You should identify AKEL as a Communist Party, not merely a left-wing party.
The article goes on to completely focus on Anastasiades. It is true that Anastasiades is the favourite to win because EDEK squabbles with AKEL so much, but I would have thought you would show more solidarity with Communist AKEL and give a more balanced picture of the two candidates. Instead you barely mention Malas, let alone what he stands for.
Cyprus has good relations with China, and I remain in support of the Chinese Communist Party. I am disappointed you do not show more support for your comrades in Cyprus instead of following the lead of the capitalist press.
In solidarity,
Tsukoui