observer wrote:The reason why RoC builds more dams than anyone else is that RoC has less rain than anyone else, certainly any other European country. Nicosia receives an average of 342.2 mm of rain per year, just over half that of Mersin’s 609.6 mm per year. You need your dams and desalination.
The Mersin flood article I posted was last winter. This winter may be drier. If you are claiming that a location that receives, on average, the same rainfall as London is a desperately dry area then I really must disagree. I’m sure that the inhabitants of the Thames valley would be on my side, especially after this winter. And the inhabitants of Mersin after last winter would side with me too. The rainfall figures don’t even include the run-off from the snow melt from the Taurus Mountains.
The exceptionally dry weather (note the word exceptionally) articles that you keep quoting refer to Istanbul. That’s rather like quoting the weather figures from Aberdeen to illustrate the climate in London.
You seem to be clutching at straws.
First it’s all a big hoax. Construction work at both ends and pipeline laid seems to prove you wrong.
Then ‘water won’t flow uphill’. How do you think water gets from your desalination plants to Nicosia? Clue – it’s not carried in buckets.
Then ‘the water will crush the pipes’. The pressure inside a pipe filled with water is the same as that outside as both have the same effective height of water above them.
70 years ago, in 1944, the Allies laid the pipeline PLUTO (Pipeline Under The Ocean) 70 miles from the Isle of Wight to the Cherbourg peninsula. Later, other lines were laid across the Channel delivering ultimately 100,000 gallons of fuel a day to the invasion forces. The real surprise would be if a pipeline could not be laid across a shorter distance in 2014.
Firstly PLUTO ( and this has been raised already in this thread )... BillC has visited an exhibition on this at Shanklin Chine, IoW. ...
As J says... completely different specification. The cross-sea part of PLUTO was a 3 inch diameter multi-layered metal or steel pipe laid on a sedimentary sea-bed in max 200 feet of water. It wasn't wallowing around in some fanciful mid-ocean state.
As you say, the PLUTO system has of course moved on and nowadays there isn't an off-shore gas or oil field that isn't connected with hundreds of miles of steel pipe laid on the sea-bed and built to withstand the massive pressures down there, which begs the question that if Turkey is serious about this project, why hasn't it adopted a tried and tested modern PLUTO-type system...??? ... and instead has opted for the novel Heath Robinson, floating plastic pipe solution...???
Secondly, Bill C has made absolutely bugger-all claims as to the over-all, average rainfall in Mersin or anywhere else in Turkey. The refs are to this past winter's rainfall and the parlous state of the Turkish reservoirs.
Thirdly, there has only been activity, in recent weeks, close to shore at Anamur. That hasn't passed unnoticed but there has been no activity off-shore CY. So your claims that "pipeline laid" are far, far from the whole truth. It still points to jetties with a ship transport of water in-between.
Fourthly , in the Zaman and Hurriyet articles listed above you will find refs to the poor water supply situation
in Ankara and in the west and south of Turkey, as well as Istanbul. ... and not just Istanbul or Aberdeen or wherever you claim.
If you have an issue with with Zaman and Hurriyet's reporting... take it up with them.Fifthly, the Republic's five desalt plants are connected to the Southern Conveyor System. A massive, largely hidden in pipes and tunnels, project that runs along the southern coast (from Paphos to practically Agia Napa) and with a spur to Nic. In parts using gravity and in others pumped, as the Republic doesn't have magical Turkish Gravity that makes water flow uphill.
Sixthly, you have provided no evidence of the level of snow on the Taurus and further you haven't considered the snow to rainfall equivalent, which is widely reported as 10:1 ... "... The "average" snow to liquid ratio is 10:1. This is saying that if 10 inches of snow fell and that snow was melted it would produce 1 inch of liquid precipitation in the rain gauge. ..."
Ten inches of snow on a mountain equals one inch of rain!