Maximus wrote:Demonax wrote:Viewpoint wrote:
how we develop our water resources is up to us not you.
It's not up to you. It's up to Turkey. You have no say in anything that happens in the occupied areas.
This "project" is not for the TC's, its for Turkey and Firats commercial benefit.
This is propaganda to be used against the GC's by TC's and keeps them "interested" and under Turkeys spell.
It is also meant for Turkey to charge what ever it wants for the water from the TCs, and they will do so through the nose, just to milk the TCs dry.
It is also meant for Turkey to trade water for Gas with the RoC. The only problem for Turkey is, they haven't quiet figured out how to stop the rain and snow falling on Cyprus, to make the RoC become dependent on the water from Turkey.
But there's more bad news for Turkey, because now that everyone agrees that LNG plant will be built in the RoC, it will be shipped by sea and not by pipes through Turkey. Even Turkey would want to buy LNG, because it will be cheaper than directly coming from pipes from it's sources. The other bad news for Turkey would be that they will also lose their what ever geopolitical advantage they may have (if any) in the region by having gas pipes going through Turkey with less gas passing through, by Turkey receiving LNG from ships. Talk about Turkey being stuck between a Rock and a Hard place, or between an LNG plant and Gas Pipes.
Short-term LNG deals cut energy prices: Analysts
Easy transportation of liquefied natural gas (LNG) with ships enables countries to buy cheaper natural gas with short-term contracts, which would also be an opportunity for Turkey to reduce its energy spending.
Another energy analyst pointed out the flipside of the coin, noting LNG contracts would harm Turkey’s only upper hand in energy relationships: the geopolitical advantage. “If we switch to LNG, the idea of giving up pipeline gas in other words, it would take [away] our geopolitical dominance,” he said.
July/10/2013
http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/short- ... sCatID=348