GreekIslandGirl wrote:supporttheunderdog wrote:YOU ARE MISREPRESENTING MY POSITION AND YOU KNOW IT.
I didn't "misrepresent" your position. I merely stated my own informed opinion of you.
(If anyone has a complaint about misrepresentation, it should be I about you - since you provide an example of why we should limit genetics data on the Internet.)supporttheunderdog wrote:There is however no point in arguing with you because you are so irrational when it comes to your own delusions.
Good, then stop trolling me when I post to others.
No, liittle star you misrepresented my position when I suspect in reality you have no informed opinion about me. You may have an opinion but I suspect it is speculative and formed from your own bigotry and as usual YOUR reply is lacking any substance.
Incidentally when you here post to the world at large, not individuals. If you don't want adverse remarks, best not to post at all.
One other point your strange genetic theories do not explain is why despite the fact that our parents speak a particular language (or languages) and can read and write and eg cook or play the piano etc, we cannot naturally do so, but have to learn these skills, when you claimed the ability to perform craft skills was inherited...
likewise when were discussing the relationship between Kibrilisi and Kypreos and their likely common origin and I pointed you in the general direction of work by a number of people who had done comparative genetic analysis and formed the view the two groups were genetically very close, you produced a study which I don't think you understood (or hoped I would not sufficiently understand) which did not deal with the similarities but some rare mutations in three specific identifiable groups of closely connected people from specific geographic locations who in consequence had predilections to particular illnesses. Now apart from the fact that this did not deal with the many similarities (far more than between homo sapiens and dinosaurs and at a far closer level) if and in so far as these mutations were a distinguishing feature not only did these rare mutations distinguish the carriers of them from Kibrilisi but also from the vast majority of the Kypreos. It was however only one mutation. It does however suggest that if genetic information is to be suppressed (and I do not think it should) then you should certainly not be allowed near it?
Do you not like it because it shows how close the Kibrilisi are to the Kypreos - closer than they generally are to either Greeks from modern Greece or Turks from modern Turkey. and that it tends to show that significant descent from Mycenaeans (one of the corner stones of the the "Cyprus is Greek" myth) is unlikely.
(BTW I do wish to disassociate myself from the terms in which GR describes Greeks from what is now Greece since they too can probably mostly claim majority descent from the earliest permanent settlers of that area ) ,